PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12171663

Are we getting the point? Needlestick injuries-an ongoing problem.

T K McAdam·R E McLaughlin·B McNicholl
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The pattern of glove perforation using hollow needles is unknown and the incidence, using sensitive electronic methods has not been described. We wished to identify the glove perforation rate following the use of hollow needles in our Emergency Department. Two hundred and eighty-nine gloves were collected over three months. These gloves were electronically tested and compared with one hundred unused control gloves. There were 28/298 perforations (9.7%) vs 1/100 in the control group (P<0.01 Fisher's exact probability). Most perforations were located on the thumb and index fingers. There were no needlestick injuries reported during this period. The glove perforation rate following hollow needle use in our Emergency Department is higher than previously reported. The pattern of perforation suggests injury by the needle held in the dominant hand.

Explore related subjects

BiopsyDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresElectric ConductivityEmergency Service, HospitalGloves, ProtectiveHand InjuriesHumansIrelandLatexMaterials TestingNeedlestick InjuriesSafetyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T K McAdam, R E McLaughlin, B McNicholl. 2002. Are we getting the point? Needlestick injuries-an ongoing problem.. https://doi.org/10.1258/09564620260079590

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

BACKGROUND: In fair-skinned Caucasian populations both the incidence and mortality rates of cutaneous melanoma have been increasing over the past decades. With adjuvant therapies still being under investigation, early detection is the only way to improve melanoma patient survival. The influence of incisional biopsies on melanoma patient survival has been discussed for many years. This study investigates both the influence of diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of residual tumor cells in the re-excision specimen on disease free and overall survival. METHODS: After (partial) removal of a pigmented skin lesion 471 patients were diagnosed with stage I/II melanoma and underwent re-excision and a sentinel node biopsy. All patients were followed prospectively, mean follow up >5 years. Patients were divided according to their diagnostic biopsy type (wide excision biopsy, narrow excision biopsy, excision biopsy with positive margins and incisional biopsy) and the presence of residual tumor cells in their re-excision specimen. Survival analysis was done using Cox's proportional hazard model adjusted for eight important confounders of melanoma patient survival. RESULTS: The diagnostic biopsy was wide in 279 patients, narrow in 109 patients, 52 patients underwent an excision biopsy with positive margins and 31 patients an incisional biopsy. In 41 patients residual tumor cells were present in the re-excision specimen. Both the diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of tumor cells in the re-excision specimen did not influence disease free and overall survival of melanoma patients. CONCLUSIONS: Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

Biopsy↗