PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12186206

A prospective study to determine whether cover gowns in addition to gloves decrease nosocomial transmission of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in an intensive care unit.

Arjun Srinivasan·Xiaoyan Song·Tracy Ross·William Merz·Roy Brower·Trish M Perl
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) remain a significant nosocomial pathogen. Current guidelines of the Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend the use of gowns and gloves for some interactions with VRE-infected or -colonized patients to prevent nosocomial transmission of VRE. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of disposable cover gowns on preventing nosocomial transmission of VRE. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective study in a 16-bed medical intensive care unit of a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: All patients who were at risk to acquire VRE, were admitted to the intensive care unit from August 1998 to January 1999, and had at least two perirectal cultures were included in the analysis of VRE acquisition. INTERVENTION: VRE isolation precautions were changed from gowns and gloves to gloves alone. MAIN OUTCOME risk factors for VRE acquisition. RESULTS: The VRE acquisition rate was 1.80 cases per 100 days at risk in the gown and gloves period compared with 3.78 in the gloves only period (P = .04). In a proportional hazards model adjusted for length of stay, gloves only precautions with a hazard ratio of 2.5 (P = .02; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 5.3) were the only independent risk factor for VRE acquisition. CONCLUSION: Our data lend support to current HICPAC recommendations for the use of cover gowns to decrease nosocomial transmission of VRE.

Explore related subjects

BaltimoreCross InfectionEnterococcusFemaleGloves, ProtectiveGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHumansIntensive Care UnitsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesProtective ClothingVancomycin ResistanceEvaluation StudyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Arjun Srinivasan, Xiaoyan Song, Tracy Ross, William Merz, Roy Brower, Trish M Perl. 2002. A prospective study to determine whether cover gowns in addition to gloves decrease nosocomial transmission of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in an intensive care unit.. https://doi.org/10.1086/502079

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2002

Screening for HIV infection in high-risk communities by urine antibody testing.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of urine screening to detect HIV-infected individuals in high-prevalence communities. METHODS: Urine HIV testing was performed at 16 discrete events and four ongoing testing sites in Baltimore communities with a high incidence of HIV infection. When possible, positive urine test results were confirmed by blood testing. In addition, we attempted to obtain blood samples from subjects who reported a possible exposure to HIV but did not have a positive urine test. RESULTS: From February 1998 to August 2001, we screened 1718 persons. Overall, 210 persons (12%) were HIV-positive, of whom 169 (80%) had never previously tested positive; 87% of those who tested positive received their results, and most were referred for medical care. CONCLUSIONS: Urine-based screening for HIV infection in high-prevalence inner city communities can be an effective tool for identifying and treating infected persons who are unaware of their infection.

Baltimore↗
PubMed2002

The choice: Lewellys F. Barker and the full-time plan.

In 1914, Lewellys F. Barker, William Osler's successor as Professor of Medicine and physician-in-chief at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, resigned to enter private practice rather than accept the terms of a full-time plan, whereby professors in clinical departments would be salaried like other professors in the university. Barker had been an early proponent of the full-time plan. His decision reflected not only a personal desire for a larger income but also contradictions inherent in the Flexnerian ideal of clinical medicine as a research-oriented university discipline devoid of financial incentives to see patients. In private practice, Barker maintained a high profile as a teacher, writer, supporter of the Johns Hopkins medical institutions, and public figure. The issues raised by his difficult decision remain relevant and have not been satisfactorily resolved.

Baltimore↗