PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12193325

Peer consultation as a method for promoting problem-based learning during a paediatrics course.

Abstract

In problem-based learning (PBL) there are problems during tutorial group sessions, for example lack of participation, interaction and cohesion, and withdrawing. The authors evaluated whether these problems could be avoided with a peer consultation model. Peer consultation takes advantage of cooperation between students by encouraging them to accept more responsibility for learning from their peers. Forty-nine fifth-year students participated in three group sessions where they solved a paediatric case problem. The students were working in small groups, assuming the following roles in turn: presenters, facilitators and observers. The students reported that this consultative method forced one to actually define the problem, helped to develop communication skills and to identify problematic issues from different viewpoints and offered the possibility to evaluate personal problem-solving strategies. The method also gave an opportunity for students to learn in practice how to utilize new technology in data searching. These experiences suggest that the model of peer consultation adds new flavour, increasing enthusiasm in problem-based learning.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Marjo Renko, Matti Uhari, Hannu Soini, Marianne Tensing. 2002. Peer consultation as a method for promoting problem-based learning during a paediatrics course.. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590220145789

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

SPINE 2: a system for collaborative structural proteomics within a federated database framework.

We present version 2 of the SPINE system for structural proteomics. SPINE is available over the web at http://nesg.org. It serves as the central hub for the Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, allowing collaborative structural proteomics to be carried out in a distributed fashion. The core of SPINE is a laboratory information management system (LIMS) for key bits of information related to the progress of the consortium in cloning, expressing and purifying proteins and then solving their structures by NMR or X-ray crystallography. Originally, SPINE focused on tracking constructs, but, in its current form, it is able to track target sample tubes and store detailed sample histories. The core database comprises a set of standard relational tables and a data dictionary that form an initial ontology for proteomic properties and provide a framework for large-scale data mining. Moreover, SPINE sits at the center of a federation of interoperable information resources. These can be divided into (i) local resources closely coupled with SPINE that enable it to handle less standardized information (e.g. integrated mailing and publication lists), (ii) other information resources in the NESG consortium that are inter-linked with SPINE (e.g. crystallization LIMS local to particular laboratories) and (iii) international archival resources that SPINE links to and passes on information to (e.g. TargetDB at the PDB).

Cooperative Behavior↗

The prefaces by Charcot: leitmotifs of an international career.

The objective of this article was to examine the prefaces that Jean-Martin Charcot wrote for other colleagues' books and to evaluate these short essays from three perspectives: scientific material discussed, medicopolitical strategies revealed, and larger thematic issues developed. Charcot (1825-1893) was the most celebrated clinical neurologist of his epoch. In his mid and late career, he wrote very few manuscripts, delegating such work to junior colleagues or to Bourneville, who compiled Charcot's Complete Works. One particular source of direct writing from Charcot's mature career is the group of prefaces he composed for selected monographs authored by other colleagues. The prefaces from the Gasser tabulation (Bibliothèque Charcot, Paris) of Charcot's works were examined and analyzed in the context of Charcot's career. Of the 21 prefaces, 10 concerned books by other colleagues with whom he had not worked, and 11 introduced books of his students or direct colleagues. The prefaces concerned primarily two topics of direct medical interest to Charcot: localization studies of cortical and spinal cord diseases, and the combined subject of hysteria and hypnotism. In placing the works in scientific context, Charcot systematically emphasized the contributions of French neurologists, largely focusing on the Salpêtrière school and its (his) discoveries. Charcot used these prefaces to summarize the major thematic elements of his career, drafting the essays in the context of such topics as medical specialization, the concept of experimental medicine, and the prioritization of human studies over experimental laboratory medicine. Although an exhaustive reading of Charcot's entire opus is needed to provide a comprehensive view of his ideas, the short and pithy prefaces, comprising fewer than 60 pages, coalesce and distill the primary themes of his international career.

Cooperative Behavior↗