PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12204719

Prostaglandin postscript: a personal reflection.

Laszlo Z Bito
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The long and arduous process that led to the development of ocular hypotensive prostaglandin derivatives over the past three decades has been reviewed several times. In this "postscript" to the second Survey of Ophthalmology supplement devoted to the ocular hypotensive effects of prostaglandin derivatives, only two aspects of this new approach to the medical management of glaucoma are discussed: 1) The implication of the observed prostaglandin-induced increase in iridial pigmentation with respect to the understanding of the role of prostaglandins and of iridial melanocytes in the protection against the damaging effects of light, and in the maintenance of normal intraocular microenvironment; and 2) The rationale behind the use of a combined formulation of a prostaglandin derivative and a beta-blocker for the protection against increased intraocular pressure. The need to consider not only target pressure, but also target mechanisms, in the selection of medical therapy regimen for any given glaucoma patient is emphasized.

Explore related subjects

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsDrug Therapy, CombinationEye ColorGlaucomaHumansIntraocular PressureIrisPigmentation DisordersProstaglandins, SyntheticJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Laszlo Z Bito. 2002. Prostaglandin postscript: a personal reflection.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6257(02)00321-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

Effects of initiating carvedilol in patients with severe chronic heart failure: results from the COPERNICUS Study.

CONTEXT: Beta-blockers remain underused despite their established utility for improving outcome in heart failure. Concerns that initiation of treatment produces few immediate benefits and may have important risks may be deterring widespread use. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the early effects of the beta-blocker carvedilol in patients with severe heart failure. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted from October 28, 1997, to March 20, 2000, at 334 hospital centers in 21 countries among 2289 patients with symptoms of heart failure at rest or with minimal exertion who were clinically euvolemic and had a left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 25%. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to receive carvedilol, with start dosage of at 3.125 mg twice daily with uptitration to a target dosage of 25 mg twice daily (n = 1156), or placebo (n = 1133), in addition to their usual medications for heart failure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Death, hospitalization, or permanent withdrawal from study drug, as well as adverse events during the first 8 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: The carvedilol group experienced no increase in cardiovascular risk but instead had fewer patients who died (19 vs 25; hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-1.35); who died or were hospitalized (134 vs 153; HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.67-1.07); or who died, were hospitalized, or were permanently withdrawn from treatment (162 vs 188; HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.68-1.03). These effects were similar in direction and magnitude to those observed during the entire study, and were apparent particularly in the 624 patients with recent or recurrent decompensation or a very depressed left ventricular ejection fraction. Differences in favor of carvedilol became apparent as early as 14 to 21 days following initiation of treatment. Worsening heart failure was the only serious adverse event with a frequency greater than 2% and was reported with similar frequency in the placebo and carvedilol groups (6.4% vs 5.1%). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that, in clinically euvolemic patients, the relation of benefit to risk during initiation of treatment with carvedilol is similar to that seen during long-term therapy with the drug. Our findings should provide the reassurance needed to encourage the high levels of use that are warranted by the results of long-term clinical trials.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗