PubMed · 12209861
"False" hope.
Abstract
"False" hope is condemned in the literature on the grounds that it reflects the counterproductive use of: (a) expectations based on illusions rather than reality, (b) inappropriate goals, and (c) poor strategies to reach desired goals. Snyder, Harris, et al.'s (1991) hope theory involving self-referential thoughts about finding routes to desired goals (pathways) and the motivation to use those routes (agency) is used as a framework for examining these three criticisms of false hope. It is concluded that the presently available evidence does not support any of the false-hope criticisms. The implications of hope-related issues for the applied clinical arena are discussed.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
C R Snyder, Kevin L Rand, Elisa A King, David B Feldman, Julia T Woodward. 2002. "False" hope.. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10096
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.