PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12216972

Cemented cup revisions.

Charles L Nelson
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Among the several treatment techniques for acetabular reconstruction after total hip arthroplasty is cemented acetabular revision. Use of isolated cemented cup revision is not frequently chosen for acetabular revision, however, because outcomes with this technique are poor despite improved cementing techniques. Most cemented cup revisions are performed for severe bone loss when biologic fixation near the normal hip center is unlikely and are often supplemented with bone grafting and metal reinforcement devices cases. Advantages of using this technique are the ability to incorporate antibiotics into the cement and the ability to customize the cement mantle to host bone.

Explore related subjects

AcetabulumArthroplasty, Replacement, HipCementationHumansPlastic Surgery ProceduresReoperationJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Charles L Nelson. 2002. Cemented cup revisions.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12216972/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

Improving reliability in the classification of fractures of the acetabulum.

BACKGROUND: Plain radiographs of the pelvis are routinely used in the initial assessment of patients with suspected fractures of the acetabulum. It is necessary for orthopaedic resident trainees, emergency physicians as well as orthopaedic surgeons who infrequently treat trauma patients to be able to describe these fracture patterns reliably to traumatologist orthopaedic surgeons who ultimately take over the patient care. Our purpose was two-fold: (1) to determine the reliability of the component parts of the Letournel classification of acetabular fractures involving six anteroposterior (AP) radiographic lines, and (2) to examine whether the addition of oblique radiograph views (Judet views) would improve the reliability. METHODS: Thirty sets of AP and oblique radiographs (Judet views) of the pelvis were selected from a hospital database to represent various types of acetabular fractures. Six reviewers (three orthopaedic trainees and three community orthopaedic surgeons) independently reviewed the radiographs. For each radiograph, the reviewer classified the acetabular fracture according to the Letournel classification. In addition, each reviewer utilized a simplified classification scheme using six radiographic lines on the AP pelvic radiograph. Interobserver reliabilities among reviewers were reported along with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and kappa values. RESULTS: Agreement for the Letournel classification increased with increasing physician experience (trainees ICC=-0.14 and community surgeons ICC=0.56). Interobserver reliability between trainees and community surgeons improved when the six radiographic lines were used (range kappa=0.09-0.89). The oblique pelvic radiographs (Judet views) did not significantly improve reliability among physicians. CONCLUSIONS: In this study we report the following: (1) the reliability of the Letournel classification improves with level of training, (2) physicians with less experience with acetabular fractures have significantly better agreement in identifying fractures using the six radiographic lines on the AP film than the Letournel classification, and (3) agreement among the reviewers for the AP pelvic radiograph is not improved with additional oblique (Judet) views.

Acetabulum↗
PubMed2003

Two alternative methods for the measurement of MZ distance on a hip radiograph.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the use of two alternative measurement methods for the MZ distance, the distance between the acetabular centre (M) and the femoral head centre (Z), on an anteroposterior hip radiograph. METHODS: The MZ distance was measured in 900 normal and 34 dysplastic adult hips by using the classic method (MZ-c) and two alternative methods (MZ-m and MZ-x). MZ-m utilized the vectorial distance between points M and Z, like MZ-c, but was expressed as a positive or negative value according to the localization of the points with respect to each other. MZ-x was the projected distance between points M and Z on the x-axis, which was the line perpendicular to the two parallel lines passing through points M and Z, and was expressed as a positive or negative value according to the localization of the points with respect to each other. RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between the centre-edge angle and the three measurement methods in both normal and dysplastic hips. The lowest normal limits for MZ-m and MZ-x in adult hips were considered to be -3 mm and -2 mm, respectively (point Z is lateral to point M). Intraobserver and interobserver measurement variations of both methods were less than 2 mm. CONCLUSION: Both alternative methods were considered more useful than the classic one in the exact determination of the distance between the centres of the femoral head and the acetabulum.

Acetabulum↗
PubMed2003

Uncemented acetabular components with polyethylene or alumina liners.

Sixty consecutive patients (60 hips) were allocated in two matched-pair groups. Patients were matched for age, gender, body mass index, level of activity, and bone stock. Both groups received an uncemented total hip arthroplasty with a modular press-fit cup and an alumina femoral head. In the first group, an acetabular liner made of polyethylene was used; in the second group, an alumina liner. Both groups were followed for a minimum of 5 years. No hip required revision, and there was no radiographic evidence of aseptic loosening in either group. Mean Harris hip score was 94.7 (87.1-99) points in the polyethylene group and 93 (88.5-100) points in the alumina group.

Acetabulum↗