PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12227121

Integrating qualitative research into evidence based practice.

Abstract

This article attempts to provide an overview of qualitative tools and methods using mainly examples from diabetes research. The other articles in this issue of the Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America have demonstrated the enormous contribution made in the past 15 years or so by rigorous quantitative studies of prevalence, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy to clinical decision-making in endocrinology. In the early 21st century, the state of qualitative research into such topics as the illness experience of diabetes; the barriers to effective self care and positive health choices; the design of complex educational interventions; the design of appropriate, acceptable and responsive health services; and the decision-making behavior of health professionals, is such that there remain many more questions than answers. But qualitative research is increasingly recognized as an important, legitimate and expanding dimension of evidence-based health care (18;19). It is highly likely that the major landmark studies in diabetes care over the next decade will build on an exploratory qualitative study or incorporate an explanatory or evaluative dimension based on qualitative methods.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Trisha Greenhalgh. 2002. Integrating qualitative research into evidence based practice.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-8529(02)00009-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Controversy in clinical endocrinology: reclassification of insulin-like growth factor I production and action disorders.

CONTEXT: The need for the least ambiguous terminology for disorders affecting IGF-I production and action has become necessary with identification of defects at various steps in the GH-IGF-I axis and the promotion of new indications for and modalities of growth therapy. No generally agreed-upon or consensus-derived classification exists. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to designate all disorders affecting IGF-I production and action by their discrete location, as is already done with the defects in pituitary differentiation factors, avoiding imprecise and ambiguous terminology. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a pragmatic classification that is a precise listing of specific disorders sequentially following the GH-IGF-I axis, using their accepted designations, and the abolition of nonspecific or ambiguous terminology. This concept permits ready insertion of new discoveries.

Endocrinology↗

[Diagnosis and treatment of solitary thyroid nodule--study and evaluation in Portugal].

INTRODUCTION: The best diagnostic and treatment strategy for an approach to the nodular thyroid disease continues to be a controversial issue. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to characterise medical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of nodular thyroid disease by endocrinologists and surgeons in Portugal in 2002. METHODS: A questionnaire based on that used by the European Thyroid Association and the American Thyroid Association was drawn up. The questionnaire, based on a well-defined index case, was circulated by the Portuguese Endocrinology Society to endocrinologists and surgeons: 42 year-old woman with solitary thyroid nodule measuring 2 x 3 cm, with no history of malfunction or painful symptoms. Each doctor was asked to reply as to the adopted diagnosis and therapy procedures for the index case. Eleven variations to the original case were proposed in order to evaluate the alterations for each variation. RESULTS: 1492 questionnaires were sent out, 163 to endocrinologists and 1329 to surgeons. A total of 104 were returned. The global response rate was 7%. The response rate for endocrinologists was 27% and 4.5% for surgeons. Of the 104 questionnaires returned, 42% were from endocrinologists and 58% from surgeons. Concerning tests prescribed, surgeons would use more tests than endocrinologists for the index case. The main differences in laboratory terms were the higher number of prescriptions for total T4 and T3 and thyroglobulin by surgeons and more prescriptions for AATPO by endocrinologists. The average number of tests was 4.6, 4.1 for endocrinologists and 5.1 for surgeons. Relative to imaging and cytology, 32% of doctors advocated a scintigraphy to diagnose the index case, with no significant differences between endocrinologists and surgeons. Ultrasonography was used by over 85% of respondents. 90% prescribed a cytology, 83% guided by palpation and 18% ultrasonography-guided. Concerning treatment, 33% of doctors advocated levothyroxin treatment; surgery was advocated by 16.3% of endocrinologists and 36.6% of surgeons. Meanwhile, the majority of doctors (68%) would opt for no treatment and simply maintain the patient under surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: There are important differences in the approach to nodular thyroid disease among the various doctors and specialists, which highlight the difficulty in achieving a diagnostic and therapeutic consensus.

Endocrinology↗