PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12231323

Effect of hydrodissection on intraoperative performance: randomized study.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of hydrodissection on intraoperative performance during phacoemulsification of age-related nuclear cataracts. SETTING: Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Ahmedabad, India, and Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA. METHODS: In a prospective study, 86 eyes were randomly assigned to have multiquadrant hydrodissection (+HD, n = 48) or no hydrodissection (-HD, n = 38) during phacoemulsification of a grade 1 to 3 nuclear cataract. Excluded were patients with grade 4 or 5 nuclear sclerosis, a poorly dilating pupil, or associated ocular/systemic disease. Parameters assessed were nucleus and cortex removal time, the amount of fluid used for cortex removal, and the total amount of fluid used. The ease of nucleus rotation and cortical cleanup was also evaluated and graded subjectively as very easy, difficult, or very difficult. Data were analyzed using the Student t test and the chi-square test. RESULTS: The mean nucleus removal time was 355 seconds +/- 237 (SD) and 474 +/- 212 seconds in the +HD and -HD groups, respectively (P =.09). The mean cortex removal time was significantly less in the +HD group than in the -HD group (79 +/- 51 seconds and 220 +/- 222 seconds, respectively) (P =.007). Significantly less fluid (43%) was used for cortex removal in the +HD group than in the -HD group (mean 70 +/- 45 mL and 123 +/- 82 mL, respectively) (P =.013), and significantly less total fluid (35%) was used in the +HD group (312 +/- 132 mL and 422 +/- 80 mL, respectively) (P =.002). Nucleus rotation was easy in all eyes in the +HD group; 68.43% of eyes in the -HD group failed to achieve rotation (P =.001). Cortex removal was very easy in 52.08% of eyes in the +HD group and easy in 47.90%; it was easy in 52.63% in the -HD group, difficult in 36.84%, and very difficult in 10.52%. CONCLUSION: The use of multiquadrant cortical-cleaving hydrodissection made removal of the lens nucleus and cortex easier and faster during phacoemulsification of age-related nuclear cataracts.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Abhay R Vasavada, Raminder Singh, David J Apple, Rupal H Trivedi, Suresh K Pandey, Liliana Werner. 2002. Effect of hydrodissection on intraoperative performance: randomized study.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0886-3350(01)01252-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Objective assessment comparing hand-assisted and conventional laparoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although several reports have subjectively highlighted the benefits of hand-assisted as compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery, there has been little objective analysis comparing these two techniques. METHODS: For this study, 12 trained laparoscopic surgeons completed standardized knot-tying and dissection tasks in a laparoscopic trainer using both hand-assisted (HandPort) and traditional laparoscopic techniques. Motion analysis with the Imperial College Surgical Assessment Device was used to assess performance, measuring the number of movements made, the path length of hand travel, and the time taken. Mann-Whitney U tests were used to compare hand-assisted (HA) and conventional laparoscopic (L) performance. A p value less than 0.05 was deemed significant. Means and standard deviations are shown in the results. RESULTS: In knot tying, for both the dominant and nondominant hands, hand-assisted rather than conventional laparoscopic techniques resulted in reduced movements (dominant: HA [114 +/- 50] vs L [321 +/- 118, p < 0.001], nondominant: HA [89 +/- 36] vs L [296 +/- 96, p < 0.001]); path length (dominant: HA [1,083 +/- 680 mm] vs L [3,637 +/- 1,852 mm, p < 0.001], nondominant: HA [549 +/- 339 mm] vs L [2,556 +/- 1,042 mm, p < 0.001]); and time taken (HA [162 +/- 50 s] vs L [460 +/- 179 s, p < 0.001]). However, there was no statistical difference for any measured variable with respect to the dissection task. CONCLUSION: Hand-assisted surgery significantly improves the knot-tying ability among trained laparoscopic surgeons. However, there appears to be no improvement in performance for this specific dissection task.

Dissection↗

Rare variation in course and affluence of internal iliac vein due to its anatomical and surgical significance.

During regular dissection of the retroperitoneal region, three uncommon anatomical variations of the internal iliac veins were found on dissected specimens: in the first case, the internal iliac veins converge forming a common trunk draining into the left external iliac vein. In the other two cases, the internal iliac vein crosses the median plane and flows into the contralateral common iliac vein. These anomalies result from a persistence of the embryonic inferior branch of the cardinal vein and are important to be known for they may be undetected or may not appear in imaging. These data have implications for both pelvic surgeons and anatomists who manipulated this anatomical area.

Dissection↗