PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12306800

Three views. (Planned parenthood).

J Henderson
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

"I have yet to find I person in the Federation who believes that planned parenthood alone will produce economic development and alone will reduce the birthrate. These might have been real arguments in 1963 or even 1968 but everyone has now had enough experience to recognize how complicated are the problems with which we deal. Could we not agree that there is no priority to be decided between human happiness and human survival - that individual and collective approaches support one another and that our organization is flexible enough to let every association decide to approach this question according to the circumstances in their country? I would plead that we bury this hatchet and get on with the tremendous common tasks we face for the rest of this decade."

Explore related subjects

International AgenciesOrganizationsPopulation ControlPublic PolicyIppfPolicyPopulation PolicySocial PolicyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Henderson. 1974. Three views. (Planned parenthood).. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12306800/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2003

The Swedish ICRP Project--a presentation.

This project was financed by subsidiaries to the Swedish nuclear industry and performed in collaboration with national authorities and others. It was aimed at analysing general radiological protection principles and their consequences in view of the discussion opened up by the ICRP; 'road testing' some case studies was one important component. The main conclusions are: that radiological protection decisions will probably remain much the same under modified ICRP recommendations following ideas currently floated by the ICRP, that there are possibilities in those ideas, but also that a number of issues need to be addressed and their implementation will require time.

International Agencies↗
PubMed2002

International Union of Pharmacology. XXXI. Recommendations for the nomenclature of multimeric G protein-coupled receptors.

A receptor is defined by the International Union of Pharmacology Committee on Receptor Nomenclature and Drug Classification (NC-IUPHAR) as a protein, or a complex of proteins, which recognizes physiologically relevant ligands that can regulate the protein to mediate cellular events (Ruffolo et al., 2000). This definition does not include associated proteins, which are not required for agonist recognition and/or receptor assembly. Thus, G proteins are not included in the nomenclature of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Similarly, proteins which modify receptor disposition, such as proteins with a PDZ domain (Sheng and Sala, 2001), and which associate with the cytosolic portion of the receptor are not included. The question arises, however, as to the way to name multimeric receptors where subunits influence receptor assembly and agonist recognition. The essential issue is whether to name the individual proteins or the association of proteins? NC-IUPHAR recommends that, where possible, the functional receptor complex be given a different name from that of the subunits.

International Agencies↗