PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12358639

Key concepts in biostatistics: using statistics to answer the question "is there a difference?".

Abstract

Biostatistics seeks to answer the question "Is there a difference?" in the rate of a disease or characteristic among subgroups of patients. The goal of this article is to introduce and define measures used in epidemiology and discuss different types of analyses in clinical research with an emphasis on the concepts and implications of the analyses rather than the mathematics. The implications of the use of measures such as incidence and prevalence, as well as odds, risk, and hazards ratios may affect study conclusions. An understanding of the distinction between these summary measures is essential. The concepts of univariate and multivariate analyses, a discussion of what it means to control for potential confounders, and a description of statistical power and significance are also presented. These concepts are integral to the design and analysis of clinical studies. An understanding of their advantages and applications will enhance the reader's ability to understand and evaluate the literature.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lynda Anne Szczech, Joseph A Coladonato, William F Owen. Key concepts in biostatistics: using statistics to answer the question "is there a difference?".. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-139x.2002.00085.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Molecular heterochrony and the evolution of sociality in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris).

Sibling care is a hallmark of social insects, but its evolution remains challenging to explain at the molecular level. The hypothesis that sibling care evolved from ancestral maternal care in primitively eusocial insects has been elaborated to involve heterochronic changes in gene expression. This elaboration leads to the prediction that workers in these species will show patterns of gene expression more similar to foundress queens, who express maternal care behaviour, than to established queens engaged solely in reproductive behaviour. We tested this idea in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) using a microarray platform with approximately 4500 genes. Unlike the wasp Polistes metricus, in which support for the above prediction has been obtained, we found that patterns of brain gene expression in foundress and queen bumblebees were more similar to each other than to workers. Comparisons of differentially expressed genes derived from this study and gene lists from microarray studies in Polistes and the honeybee Apis mellifera yielded a shared set of genes involved in the regulation of related social behaviours across independent eusocial lineages. Together, these results suggest that multiple independent evolutions of eusociality in the insects might have involved different evolutionary routes, but nevertheless involved some similarities at the molecular level.

Analysis of Variance↗

Confidence intervals for the standardized effect arising in the comparison of two normal populations.

Confidence intervals for a standardized effect are derived after stabilizing the variance of the Welch t-statistic. Simulation studies demonstrate the viability of the resulting intervals for a wide range of parameter values and sample sizes as small as five. The methodology is extended to the combination of results from several studies, so as to obtain a confidence interval for a representative standardized effect for all the studies. The methods are illustrated on a recent meta-analytic study of systolic blood pressure reduction during a weight reducing regime, as well as the classical Mumford data on psychological intervention and hospital length of stay.

Analysis of Variance↗