PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12410739

Flexible ureteroscopes: a user's guide.

J Parkin·F X Keeley·A G Timoney
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare, quantitatively and qualitatively, four small-diameter flexible ureteroscopes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four flexible ureteroscopes from different manufacturers, i.e. the DUR-8 (ACMI, Southborough, MA, USA), Olympus UPF-3 (Keymed, Southend-on-Sea, UK), Storz 11274AA (Karl Storz GmbH, Tuttlingen, Germany) and the Wolf 9 F (Henke Sass Wolf GmbH, Tuttlingen, Germany), were assessed quantitatively by measuring the active tip deflection and irrigation flow rate with laser fibres (200 micro m, 365 micro m), an electrohydraulic lithotripter (1.9 F) and grasping forceps (3 F) in position. They were then assessed subjectively by two endourologists who scored them, using a visual analogue scale (maximum 10), for insertion, deflection mechanism, manoeuvrability, rigidity, image quality and overall satisfaction. RESULTS: All the endoscopes are < 9 F at the tip, although the length of the smallest diameter (bevelled tip vs section of shaft) was variable. Tip deflection was 87-100% of the manufacturers' specifications and decreased by similar percentages with instruments in the working channel. The irrigation flow rate was comparable for instruments with a 3.6 F working channel (72-88 mL/min with an empty working channel), although much greater for the Wolf, which has a 4 F channel (116 mL/min). Direction and image size were nearly identical, as was the field of view, apart from the Wolf (60 degrees vs 90 degrees ). There was agreement in the user assessment for three instruments, with overall satisfaction scores being Storz (4), ACMI (7.5) and Olympus (8.6), but disagreement in scores for Wolf (1.9 vs 5.3). CONCLUSIONS: Whilst there were considerable similarities in the objective assessment among the instruments, the user assessment showed qualitative variability. Thus it is important to try the different instruments before selecting one. Additional variables to consider include durability, cost and service/warranty, which vary considerably among instruments.

Explore related subjects

Equipment DesignHumansUreteroscopesUreteroscopyJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Parkin, F X Keeley, A G Timoney. 2002. Flexible ureteroscopes: a user's guide.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410x.2002.03017.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Dual-trap technique for reduction of low-frequency noise in force measuring optical tweezers.

High-resolution long-time force measurements by optical tweezers are often limited by low-frequency (1/f) noise. A dual-trap technique is presented that can reduce such noise in the force signal. It incorporates a second trap (a reference trap) that probes the noise in the system and it is based upon the assumption that the low-frequency parts of the noise from the two traps are correlated. A subtraction of the low-frequency signal from the reference trap from the signal from the force measuring trap will therefore yield a net signal that is significantly less influenced by noise. It is shown that this dual-trap technique can reduce the noise in the force signal up to 60% depending on detection bandwidth.

Equipment Design↗
PubMed2007

Optimization of doses received by the hospital staff and the members of the family of patients undergoing 111In-DTPA-D-Phe1-Octreotide therapy.

According to the Euratom Directives (96/29, 97/43), the doses received by the workers as well as the family of patients and third persons during medical exposures, should conform to the dose constraint levels (DCLs), established by the authorities for each group in the context of optimisation. This study deals with the implementation of a radiation protection protocol, concerning the aforementioned group members for patients undergoing treatment with 111In-DTPA-D-Phe1-Octreotide, after intra-arterial infusion. It is shown that by applying this protocol the annual doses to the medical and technical staff are considerably reduced and remain below the established DCLs. Following the post-release behaviour instructions given to the patient, doses to the family and third persons may be kept lower than the corresponding DCLs provided by the National Regulations.

Equipment Design↗
PubMed2007

In vivo myograph measurement of muscle contraction at optimal length.

BACKGROUND: Current devices for measuring muscle contraction in vivo have limited accuracy in establishing and re-establishing the optimum muscle length. They are variable in the reproducibility to determine the muscle contraction at this length, and often do not maintain precise conditions during the examination. Consequently, for clinical testing only semi-quantitative methods have been used. METHODS: We present a newly developed myograph, an accurate measuring device for muscle contraction, consisting of three elements. Firstly, an element for adjusting the axle of the device and the physiological axis of muscle contraction; secondly, an element to accurately position and reposition the extremity of the muscle; and thirdly, an element for the progressive pre-stretching and isometric locking of the target muscle. Thus it is possible to examine individual in vivo muscles in every pre-stretched, specified position, to maintain constant muscle-length conditions, and to accurately re-establish the conditions of the measurement process at later sessions. RESULTS: In a sequence of experiments the force of contraction of the muscle at differing stretching lengths were recorded and the forces determined. The optimum muscle length for maximal force of contraction was established. In a following sequence of experiments with smaller graduations around this optimal stretching length an increasingly accurate optimum muscle length for maximal force of contraction was determined. This optimum length was also accurately re-established at later sessions. CONCLUSION: We have introduced a new technical solution for valid, reproducible in vivo force measurements on every possible point of the stretching curve. Thus it should be possible to study the muscle contraction in vivo to the same level of accuracy as is achieved in tests with in vitro organ preparations.

Equipment Design↗