PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12425367

15. Image-guided breast biopsy.

Abstract

The introduction of mammographic screening has led to an increased number of impalpable in situ and invasive breast cancers. Image-guided percutaneous biopsy in these patients has advantages over surgical biopsy, primarily cost savings and reducing the number of operations required for definitive treatment. Image-guided breast biopsy is also useful in palpable lesions. Image-guided biopsy should be used in conjunction with full clinical and imaging work-up as part of the triple assessment protocol. Techniques available include fine needle aspiration, automated needle-gun core and vacuum assisted large core biopsy. Lesions visible on ultrasound are preferentially biopsied using ultrasound guidance, while those seen only mammographically are biopsied using stereotactic guidance. Major complications are rare following image-guided biopsy. In most cases further management can be decided based on the biopsy result. If there is discordance between clinical and imaging features and the biopsy result, image-guided percutaneous biopsy should be repeated or surgical biopsy may be required.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Ralleigh, M J Michell. 2002. 15. Image-guided breast biopsy.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12425367/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet.

PURPOSE: To report the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided needle localization for diagnosis of MRI detected suspicious breast lesions located in difficult accessible regions of the breast, using the freehand method in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five patients with five MRI-only breast lesions underwent MRI-guided needle localization for histopathologic evaluation of the lesions. All interventional procedures were performed in a 3.0 T MRI system with the patient in prone position and by using a dedicated phased array breast coil. MRI-guided needle localizations were performed by using a freehand technique. In our study, the high-resolution scan allowed preprocedural localization of all lesions without use of contrast enhancement. In all cases contrast-enhanced MRI was performed after insertion of the wire to confirm the tip of the wire in direct contact with the enhancing lesion. RESULTS: Needle localizations were performed in five patients. Histopathologic evaluation of tissue after surgery excision biopsy revealed one lymph node, three invasive ductal carcinoma and one ductal carcinoma in situ. Lesion size varied from 6 to 30 mm. Mean duration time was 25 min. No complications occurred during the intervention method. In the patient with the benign lesion control MRI of the breast after 6 months confirmed lesion removal. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided needle localization by using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet is a safe and accurate method for diagnosis of difficult accessible breast lesions only visible on MRI.

Biopsy, Needle↗