PubMed · 12471738
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Morris E Bellis. 2002. Lost sleep.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12471738/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Since the early 1900s, national and international drug control legislation has acted as a key site of contention between important societal actors. Physicians and pharmacists, regulators and drug companies, patients and addicts, and researchers and pharmacologists all attempted to influence formulation and interpretation of the rules that regulate access to addicting but medically useful substances. The 1970 Controlled Substances Act (CSA) consolidated and rationalized previous US domestic legislation and paid careful attention to the international aspects of the issue. Yet the CSA also incorporated long-standing fundamental disputes about who would act as gatekeepers, what criteria would be employed in regulatory decisions, and the basic goals of drug control legislation. Rather than view the CSA as a beginning or an end, it is better conceived as a major milepost in a century-long odyssey of maneuvering among interested parties for advantage in a complex regulatory environment. Instead of providing a definitive authoritative structure to which all parties must adhere, the CSA has served as a vehicle for discernment and continuous renegotiation of essential concepts such as "abuse liability".
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.