PubMed · 12473250
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
C Andersen. 2002. Electrical stimulation vs CAB.. https://doi.org/10.1053/euhj.2002.3351
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Functional status and quality of life are important outcomes in the evaluation of revascularization approaches for symptomatic coronary artery disease. Few data are available regarding the comparative improvement in disease-specific health status after CABG versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the era of coronary stenting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cardiac-specific health status was evaluated at baseline and at 6 and 12 months after intervention with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) in patients randomized to stent-assisted PCI (n=488) versus CABG (n=500) in the Stent or Surgery trial. Scores for physical limitation, angina frequency, and quality of life improved significantly for both treatment groups at 6 months (range of improvement from 13.6 to 34.7 points) and 12 months (14.3 to 38.2 points; all P<0.001). CABG patients had greater improvement than those assigned to PCI, although the magnitude of the difference decreased over time (difference at 6 months, 4.03 to 6.48 points; 12 months, 2.05 to 2.93 points). A component of this reduction is accounted for by PCI-arm patients who required repeat intervention. Differences between treatment groups were greatest for the 6-month angina frequency scores (difference=6.48 points; 95% CI 3.96 to 8.99). Overall, treatment satisfaction was high and did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Both CABG and stent-assisted PCI dramatically improved cardiac-related health status in patients with multivessel disease at 6- and 12-month follow-up. During the first postprocedure year, patients' angina burden and physical limitations were alleviated to a greater extent with CABG.
BACKGROUND: Experimental data suggest that tissue factor (TF) may induce neointimal hyperplasia after arterial injury. In this study, we investigated the hypothesis that elevated levels of TF in the circulation contribute to the development of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or stent implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Whole-blood TF procoagulant activity (TF-PCA) was measured using a previously described assay before, at 3 hours after, and at 24 hours after the intervention in 61 patients with stable angina undergoing PTCA (n=20) or stent implantation (n=41). Coronary angiography was performed 4 to 6 months after the intervention, and luminal narrowing > or =50% was defined as restenosis. Whole-blood TF-PCA levels did not correlate with intracellular monocyte tumor necrosis factor-alpha expression, a marker of activation of these cells. Baseline levels and time course of whole-blood TF-PCA after the intervention were compared in patients who did or did not subsequently develop restenosis. Whole-blood TF-PCA levels did not change significantly in the 24 hours after either intervention. However, in both the PTCA and stent groups, initial TF-PCA was significantly higher in patients who subsequently developed restenosis (P=0.018 and 0.039 compared with those who did not develop restenosis for PTCA and stent groups, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Higher baseline values of whole-blood TF-PCA may be a predictor of restenosis after PTCA and stent implantation.