PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12481821

Helium-oxygen ventilation.

Abstract

Because of its low density, the He/O2 mixture markedly affects the dynamics of gas-flow, increasing inspiratory and expiratory flows, reducing WOB and respiratory acidosis, and relieving dyspnea in various clinical situations associated with obstructive airway disease. The magnitude of these changes varies according to the proportion of turbulent, transitional, and laminar flow conditions. These effects, however, last only as long as the patient breathes the He/O2 mixture, because it has no curative effect on the cause of airway obstruction. Thus, He/O2 ventilation is mostly useful while awaiting the effects of more definitive treatment. Evidence shows that He/O2 ventilation can improve pathophysiologic and clinical parameters in spontaneously breathing patients with upper airway obstruction, asthma. COPD, bronchopulmonary dysplasia. and bronchiolitis. Furthermore. He/O2 ventilation may prove to be a valuable adjunct in decompensated COPD patients, during both NIV and conventional mechanical ventilation. Despite promising results, however, there are two primary pitfalls to He/O2 ventilation. First, the consequences of the physical properties of the He/O2 mixture on various ventilator functions, the major differences between machines, and the correction factors to apply (if necessary) should be known. Second, in this age of cost control, particular attention should be paid to the cost-benefit ratio of He/O2 ventilation. Indeed, despite clinical evidence that the pathophysiologic principles on which He/O2 ventilation rests can be translated into favorable short-term physiologic and subjective effects, there is presently no evidence of a significant effect on patient outcome. Hence, before He/O2 ventilation can be recommended for widespread use, prospective outcome studies should be conducted in patients who suffer from the conditions discussed in this article to identify which, if any, are most likely to receive a benefit. Meanwhile, the authors recommend that He/O2 ventilation be reserved for patients who have a severe condition and who do not respond to the classic validated treatment modalities.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Philippe Jolliet, Didier Tassaux. 2002. Helium-oxygen ventilation.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1078-5337(02)00010-2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Mistletoe for cancer? A systematic review of randomised clinical trials.

Mistletoe extracts are widely used in the treatment of cancer. The results of clinical trials are however highly inconsistent. We therefore conducted a systematic review of all randomised clinical trials of this unconventional therapy. Eight databases were searched to identify all studies that met our inclusion/exclusion criteria. Data were independently validated and extracted by 2 authors and checked by the 3rd according to predefined criteria. Statistical pooling was not possible because of the heterogeneity of the primary studies. Therefore a narrative systematic review was conducted. Ten trials could be included. Most of the studies had considerable weaknesses in terms of study design, reporting or both. Some of the weaker studies implied benefits of mistletoe extracts, particularly in terms of quality of life. None of the methodologically stronger trials exhibited efficacy in terms of quality of life, survival or other outcome measures. Rigorous trials of mistletoe extracts fail to demonstrate efficacy of this therapy.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

On the non-inferiority of a diagnostic test based on paired observations.

Non-inferiority of a diagnostic test to the standard or the optimum test is a common issue in medical research. Often we want to determine if a new diagnostic test is as good as the standard reference test. Sometimes we are interested in an inexpensive test that may have an acceptably inferior sensitivity or specificity. While hypothesis testing procedures and sample size formulae for the equivalence of sensitivity or specificity alone have been proposed, very few studies have discussed simultaneous comparisons of both parameters. In this paper, we present three different testing procedures and sample size formulae for simultaneous comparison of sensitivity and specificity based on paired observations and with known disease status. These statistical procedures are then used to compare two classification rules that identify women for future osteoporotic fracture. Simulation experiments demonstrate that the new tests and sample size formulae give the appropriate type I and II error rates. Differences between our approach and the approach of Lui and Cumberland are discussed.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗