PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12528903

Developments in young infants' reasoning about occluded objects.

Abstract

Eight experiments were conducted to examine 3- and 3.5-month-old infants' responses to occlusion events. The results revealed two developments, one in infants' knowledge of when objects should and should not be occluded and the other in infants' ability to posit additional objects to make sense of events that would otherwise violate their occlusion knowledge. The first development is that, beginning at about 3 months of age, infants expect an object to become temporarily visible when passing behind an occluder with an opening extending from its lower edge. The second development is that, beginning at about 3.5 months of age, infants generate a two-object explanation when shown a violation in which an object fails to become visible when passing behind an occluder with an opening in its lower edge. Unless given information contradicting such an explanation, infants infer that two identical objects are involved in the event, one traveling to the left and one to the right of the opening. These and related findings provide the basis for a model of young infants' responses to occlusion events; alternative models are also discussed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Andréa Aguiar, Renée Baillargeon. 2002. Developments in young infants' reasoning about occluded objects.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0285(02)00005-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Long-term oral sensitivity and feeding skills of low-risk pre-term infants.

This study examined the oral sensitivity and feeding skills of low-risk pre-term infants at 11-17 months corrected age. Twenty pre-term infants (PT) born between 32 and 37 weeks at birth without any medical comorbidities were assessed. All of this PT group received supplemental nasogastric (NG) tube feeds during their birth-stay in hospital. A matched control group of 10 healthy full-term infants (FT) was also assessed. Oral sensitivity and feeding skills were assessed during a typical mealtime using the Royal Children's Hospital Oral Sensitivity Checklist (OSC) and the Pre-Speech Assessment Scale (PSAS). Results demonstrated that, at 11-17 months corrected age, the PT group displayed significantly more behaviours suggestive of altered oral sensitivity and facial defensiveness, and a trend of more delayed feeding development than the FT group. Further, results demonstrated that, relative to the FT group, pre-term infants who received greater than 3 weeks of NG feeding (PT>3NG) displayed significantly more facial defensive behaviour, and displayed significant delays across more aspects of their feeding development than pre-term infants who received less than 2 weeks of NG feeding (PT<2NG). The information from this preliminary study suggests that low-risk pre-term infants, particularly those who receive supplemental NG feeding for greater than 3 weeks, may be at risk for displaying long-term altered oral sensitivity and facial defensiveness, as well as feeding delays. These observations warrant further investigation on this topic.

Child Development↗

Growth, development and health from early fetal life until young adulthood: the Generation R Study.

In this paper the Generation R Study is presented. This study examines growth, development and health in urban children from fetal life until young adulthood. With an integrated approach of epidemiological, clinical and basic research, it focuses on four primary areas of research: (1) growth and physical development; (2) behavioural and cognitive development; (3) diseases in childhood; and (4) health and health care for pregnant women and children. The general aims of the study are: 1. to describe normal and abnormal growth, development and health from fetal life until young adulthood in a multiethnic population-based cohort; 2. to identify biological, social and environmental determinants of normal and abnormal growth, development and health from fetal life until adulthood; 3. to examine the utilisation and effectiveness of current strategies for prevention and early identification of groups at risk. Eventually, this study will contribute to the development of strategies for optimising health and health care for pregnant women and children. The Generation R Study is a prospective population-based cohort study in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. In this urban setting, 10 000 children will be examined from early fetal life until young adulthood. Data are collected by physical examinations, questionnaires, interviews, ultrasound and biological samples. The study entered its pilot phase to test the logistics in December 2001. Full participant recruitment and complete data collection started in 2002.

Child Development↗

A practice-based intervention to enhance quality of care in the first 3 years of life: the Healthy Steps for Young Children Program.

CONTEXT: There is growing concern regarding the quality of health care available in the United States for young children, and specific limitations have been noted in developmental and behavioral services provided for children in the first 3 years of life. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of the Healthy Steps for Young Children Program on quality of early childhood health care and parenting practices. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective controlled clinical trial enrolling participants between September 1996 and November 1998 at 6 randomization and 9 quasi-experimental sites across the United States. Participants were 5565 children enrolled at birth and followed up through age 3 years. INTERVENTION: Incorporation of developmental specialists and enhanced developmental services into pediatric care in participants' first 3 years of life. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quality of care was operationalized across 4 domains: effectiveness (eg, families received > or =4 Healthy Steps-related services or discussed >6 anticipatory guidance topics), patient-centeredness (eg, families were satisfied with care provided), timeliness (eg, children received timely well-child visits and vaccinations), and efficiency (eg, families remained at the practice for > or =20 months). Parenting outcomes included response to child misbehavior (eg, use of severe discipline) and practices to promote child development and safety (eg, mothers at risk for depression discussed their sadness with someone at the practice). RESULTS: Of the 5565 enrolled families, 3737 (67.2%) responded to an interview at 30 to 33 months (usual care, 1716 families; Healthy Steps, 2021 families). Families who participated in the Healthy Steps Program had greater odds of receiving 4 or more Healthy Steps-related services (for randomization and quasi-experimental sites, respectively: odds ratio [OR], 16.90 [95% confidence interval [CI], 12.78 to 22.34] and OR, 23.05 [95% CI, 17.38 to 30.58]), of discussing more than 6 anticipatory guidance topics (OR, 8.56 [95% CI, 6.47 to 11.32] and OR, 12.31 [95% CI, 9.35 to 16.19]), of being highly satisfied with care provided (eg, someone in the practice went out of the way for them) (OR, 2.06 [95% CI, 1.64 to 2.58] and OR, 2.11 [95% CI, 1.72 to 2.59]), of receiving timely well-child visits and vaccinations (eg, age-appropriate 1-month visit) (OR, 1.98 [95% CI, 1.08 to 3.62] and OR, 2.11 [95% CI, 1.16 to 3.85]), and of remaining at the practice for 20 months or longer (OR, 2.02 [95% CI, 1.61 to 2.55] and OR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.43 to 2.15]). They also had reduced odds of using severe discipline (eg, slapping in face or spanking with object) (OR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.54 to 1.26] and OR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.46 to 0.97]). Among mothers considered at risk for depression, those who participated in the Healthy Steps Program had greater odds of discussing their sadness with someone at the practice (OR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.56 to 1.63] and OR, 2.82 [95% CI, 1.57 to 5.08]). CONCLUSION: Universal, practice-based interventions can enhance quality of care for families of young children and can improve selected parenting practices.

Child Development↗