PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12597636

Packing structure and self-heating in capillary electrochromatography.

Abstract

The origin of bubble formation during operation of capillary electrochromatography (CEC) has been an issue of debate. Ohmic heating resulted from current passed through a packed column was proposed as the primary cause. However, this explanation has been questioned on the ground that the current measured in CEC is much lower than that measured with open-tubular separation systems where no bubble formation occurs. To resolve this issue, we carried out a theoretical study correlating self-heating of the electrolyte with packing structure of the column. We used a bundle of capillary tubes, a bundle of two types of capillary tubes and two bundles of capillary tubes connected serially to model, respectively, the flow channels in the column of non-porous particles, in the column of porous particles and in the column of various packing densities. The results from this study indicate that, for columns of homogeneous packing density, the heat output is indeed smaller than that in open-tubular columns of the same dimensions. In this case, the self-heating cannot be a key factor responsible for the bubble formation in CEC. However, for columns of heterogeneous packing density, a large excess of heat release may be produced in column sections of high packing density and, in turn, over-heating in such sections may become the primary cause for the formation of bubbles. It follows from this study that preparation of columns of homogeneous packing structure is essential to obtain reproducible and bubble-free CEC systems.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ligong Chen, Lei Chen, Xilong Yan, Qian-Hong Wan. 2003-02-07. Packing structure and self-heating in capillary electrochromatography.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9673(02)01872-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Recent progress in the use of ionic polymers as pseudostationary phases for EKC.

This review concerns the introduction, characterization, and application of polymeric pseudostationary phases (PSPs) for EKC since 2004. Achiral and chiral polymers and separations are reviewed, as is the application of polymeric PSPs for the combination of EKC with mass spectrometric detection.

Chromatography, Micellar Electrokinetic Capillary↗

MEKC: an update focusing on practical aspects.

This paper reviews recent methodological and instrumental advances in MEKC. Improvements in sensitivity arising from the use of on-line sample concentration (sweeping, stacking, and combination of both protocols) and derivatization (in-capillary reactions and coupling with flow-injection systems) and improvements in resolution obtained by changing the composition of the BGE (e.g., with organic modifiers, ionic liquids, nonionic and zwitterionic surfactants, mixed micelles, and vesicles) or using coated capillaries are discussed in detail. In addition, MS and LIF spectroscopy are examined in relation to their advantages and restrictions as applied to MEKC analysis. Some thoughts on potential future directions are also expressed.

Chromatography, Micellar Electrokinetic Capillary↗

Comparison of migration models for acidic solutes in micellar electrokinetic chromatography.

The validity of two models that explain the migration of ionisable solutes in micellar electrokinetic chromatography (MEKC), mobility model and retention factor model, has been tested. For this purpose, the mobility (mu) and retention factor (k) of a set of 10 phenolic compounds with different hydrophobicity and pKa values have been determined for several sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) concentrations and pH values, and fitted to the models. Results show that in general the retention factor model explains better the retention of ionisable solutes, although for hydrophilic compounds at low SDS concentration, mobility model can give better fits. The different drawbacks pointed out by several authors in relation to both models have been checked, and a deep evaluation of each one has been done. As a result we have observed that, while in the retention factor model the variation of k with pH and [SDS] always follows the same trend, the variation of mu with these variables mainly depends on the value of the binding constant of the neutral form of the solutes to the micelles, KHA(m), which plays a critical role in the fit of the mobility model. Also we provide rules and advices to set up the experimental conditions to apply each model to a particular solute.

Chromatography, Micellar Electrokinetic Capillary↗