PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12626614

Task-dependent modulation of multi-digit force coordination patterns.

Abstract

When grasping and holding an object with five digits under a variety of task constraints, subjects use well-defined force coordination patterns, i.e., consistent force covariations and in-phase synchronization among all digit pairs. The question arises as to whether these force coordination patterns are default mechanisms for controlling multi-digit force production or whether they are specific to lifting and holding an object. To address this question, we asked subjects to grasp a manipulandum and exert forces with five digits simultaneously so as to match a force template measured from an actual object grasp, lift, and hold task (GLH). Unlike GLH, the force production task (FP) lacked the constraint of having to maintain object stability against gravity. The amplitude of individual finger forces and force covariations were similar for both tasks (with the exception of the little finger, which tended to produce less force in FP). Nonetheless, when multiple grip forces were not required to hold the manipulandum against gravity (FP), there was a significantly lower tendency for forces to be synchronized with higher intertrial variability of phase differences between forces exerted by all digit-pairs. Furthermore, the tendency for force phase differences to cluster at 0 degrees was lower for FP than GLH. These results suggest that some aspects of the control of multi-digit grasping, i.e., force synchronization, are specific to object lift and hold rather than to the production of multi-digit forces. Modeling work suggests that motor unit synchronization might play an important role in the modulation of force synchronization patterns.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Matthew P Rearick, Amparo Casares, Marco Santello. 2003. Task-dependent modulation of multi-digit force coordination patterns.. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00581.2002

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Histone H3K9 methyltransferases regulate cortical growth by coordinating heterochromatin formation and neural progenitor dynamics.

DNA packaging into heterochromatin is a fundamental mechanism of transcriptional silencing, yet its role in regulating neural progenitor behavior during brain development remains poorly understood. Trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9me3), catalyzed by the methyltransferases SETDB1, SUV39H1, and SUV39H2, is a defining feature of heterochromatin, but functional redundancy among these enzymes has obscured their developmental roles. Here, we generated a cortex-specific triple knockout mouse model lacking Setdb1, Suv39h1, and Suv39h2 to directly interrogate H3K9me3 function during corticogenesis. Combined loss of H3K9 methyltransferases caused genome-wide depletion of H3K9me3, disruption of neural progenitor cell-cycle progression, and impaired cortical neurogenesis, resulting in microcephaly. H3K9 methyltransferases preserve neural progenitor identity and function by silencing clustered protocadherins, meiosis-associated genes, and a cell-cycle restraint program through H3K9me3 deposition. Loss of H3K9me3 promoted local chromatin opening and increased transcription factor occupancy, enabling transposable elements to acquire cryptic enhancer activity and modulate proximal gene expression. Together, these findings establish H3K9me3 heterochromatin as an active regulator of neural progenitor dynamics and lineage fidelity, revealing a central epigenetic mechanism that restricts aberrant transcriptional programs to ensure cortical growth.

Cerebral Cortex↗

Inability of Lyapunov exponents to predict epileptic seizures.

It has been claimed that Lyapunov exponents computed from electroencephalogram or electrocorticogram (ECoG) time series are useful for early prediction of epileptic seizures. We show, by utilizing a paradigmatic chaotic system, that there are two major obstacles that can fundamentally hinder the predictive power of Lyapunov exponents computed from time series: finite-time statistical fluctuations and noise. A case study with an ECoG signal recorded from a patient with epilepsy is presented.

Cerebral Cortex↗

Neonatal seizures: the overlap between diagnosis of metabolic disorders and structural abnormalities. Case report.

UNLABELLED: Inborn metabolic errors (IME) and cortical developmental malformations are uncommon etiologies of neonatal seizures, however they may represent treatable causes of refractory epilepsy and for this reason must be considered as possible etiological factors. This case report aims to demonstrate the importance of neuroimaging studies in one patient with neonatal seizures, even when there are clues pointing to a metabolic disorder. CASE REPORT: A previously healthy 14 day-old child started presenting reiterated focal motor seizures (FMS) which evolved to status epilepticus. Exams showed high serum levels of ammonia and no other abnormalities. A metabolic investigation was conducted with normal results. During follow-up, the patient presented developmental delay and left side hemiparesia. Seizures remained controlled with anti-epileptic drugs for four months, followed by relapse with repetitive FMS on the left side. Temporary improvement was obtained with anti-epileptic drug adjustment. At the age of 6 months, during a new episode of status epilepticus, high ammonia levels were detected. Other metabolic exams remained normal. The child was referred to a video-electroencephalographic monitoring and continuous epileptiform discharges were recorded over the right parasagittal and midline regions, with predominance over the posterior quadrant. A new neuroimaging study was performed and displayed a malformation of cortical development. Our case illustrates that because newborns are prone to present metabolic disarrangement, an unbalance such as hyperammonemia may be a consequence of acute events and conduct to a misdiagnosis of IME.

Cerebral Cortex↗