PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12647765

Interpreting reaction time measures in between-group comparisons.

Abstract

Although reaction time measures have been used extensively in many types of between-group comparisons, the assumptions and limitations of reaction time measurement are not always recognized. In this article we discuss three issues that should be considered when designing and interpreting comparisons involving reaction time. These concern speed-accuracy tradeoffs, methods of analyzing measures postulated to reflect specific processes, and methods for distinguishing group-related influences that are shared with other variables from those that are unique to a single variable.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Timothy A Salthouse, Trey Hedden. 2002. Interpreting reaction time measures in between-group comparisons.. https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.24.7.858.8392

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Psychiatric disorder criteria and their application to research in different racial groups.

BACKGROUND: The advent of standardized classification and assessment of psychiatric disorders, and considerable joint efforts among many countries has led to the reporting of international rates of psychiatric disorders, and inevitably, their comparison between different racial groups. RESULTS: In neurologic diseases with defined genetic etiologies, the same genetic cause has different phenotypes in different racial groups. CONCLUSION: We suggest that genetic differences between races mean that diagnostic criteria refined in one racial group, may not be directly and simply applicable to other racial groups and thus more effort needs to be expended on defining diseases in other groups. Cross-racial confounds (in addition to cultural confounds) make the interpretation of rates in different groups even more hazardous than seems to have been appreciated.

Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic↗