PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12661453

[Gastrostomy tubes inserted with radiologic techniques].

Abstract

Radiologic techniques can be used for patients in need of long-term enteral nutritional support. In particular, these techniques can provide solutions when endoscopic techniques cannot be performed. Percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy is an alternative to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Percutaneous radiologic transgastric jejunostomy should be reserved for patients with proven gastroesophageal reflux. When both are not possible, percutaneous radiologic jejunostomy is indicated. Percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy and percutaneous radiologic transgastric jejunostomy have a high technical success rate (> or = 91-95%). The success rate of percutaneous radiologic jejunostomy is lower (85-88%). With radiologic techniques, major complications occur in 0.5-13% of cases. The percentage of complications for percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy and percutaneous radiologic transgastric jejunostomy are lower than those for percutaneous radiologic jejunostomy. The less serious, mostly late-onset complications (2.9-13%) are usually easy to treat. Radiologic techniques have a higher initial success rate but more late-onset complications than endoscopic techniques.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I F Lim A Po, H van Overhagen, J J Nicolai. 2003-03-01. [Gastrostomy tubes inserted with radiologic techniques].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12661453/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Plaque excision with the Silverhawk catheter: early results in patients with claudication or critical limb ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to detail the early experience after infrainguinal atherectomy using the Silverhawk plaque excision catheter for the treatment of symptomatic peripheral vascular disease. METHODS: A prospective database was established in August 2004 in which data for operations, outcomes, and follow-up were recorded for patients undergoing percutaneous plaque excision for peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) ischemia scores and femoropopliteal TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) criteria were assigned. A follow-up protocol included duplex ultrasound surveillance at 1, 3, and 6 months and then yearly thereafter. Standard statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: During a 17-month period, 66 limbs of 60 patients (37 men [61.7%]) underwent 70 plaque excisions (four repeat procedures). Indications included tissue loss based on SVS ischemia at grades 5 and 6 (25/70), rest pain at grade 4 (22/70), and claudication at grades 2 to 3 (23/70). The mean lesion length was 8.8 +/- 0.7 cm. The technical success rate was 87.1% (61/70). Adjunctive treatment was required in 17 procedures (24.3%), consisting of 14 balloon angioplasties and three stents. Femoropopliteal TASC criteria included 5 TASC A lesions, 14 TASC B lesions, 32 TASC C lesions, and 19 TASC D lesions. Although 17 plaque excisions included a tibial vessel, no patient underwent isolated tibial atherectomy. The mean increase in ankle-brachial index was 0.27 +/- 0.04 and in toe pressure, 20.3 +/- 6.9 mm Hg. Mean duplex ultrasound follow-up was 5.2 months (range, 1 to 17 months). One-year primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency was 61.7%, 64.1%, and 76.4%, respectively. Restenosis or occlusion developed in 12 patients (16.7%) and was detected at a mean of 2.8 +/- 0.7 months. Restenosis or occlusion was significantly more common (P < .05) in patients with TASC C and D lesions compared with patients with TASC A and B lesions. Six (8.3%) of 12 patients underwent reintervention on the basis of duplex ultrasound surveillance results. Four (33.3%) of 12 patients experienced reocclusion during the same hospitalization, and amputation and open revascularization were required in two patients each. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous plaque excision is a viable treatment option for lower extremity revascularization. Outcomes are related to ischemia and lesion severity. Patency and limb salvage rates are equivalent to other endovascular modalities.

Catheterization, Peripheral↗