PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12701849

The position statement and its commentators: consensus, compromise or confusion?

Alastair V Campbell·Richard Huxtable
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Attitude to HealthConsensus Statements as TopicEuthanasiaEuthanasia, Active, VoluntaryHumansPalliative CareCommentEditorial

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alastair V Campbell, Richard Huxtable. 2003. The position statement and its commentators: consensus, compromise or confusion?. https://doi.org/10.1191/0269216303pm761ed

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Implementing emergency research requiring exception from informed consent, community consultation, and public disclosure.

Conducting emergency research in the out-of-hospital and emergency department setting is a challenge because of the inability of patients to provide informed consent in many situations. Federal guidelines allowing research under an exception from informed consent for emergency research have been established (21 CRF 50.24). Community consultation and public disclosure, 2 required components of obtaining this exception, are seen by many as a barrier to resuscitation research. This article will provide a brief overview of the history of the exception from informed consent for emergency research and summarize our methods recently used to successfully complete community consultation and public disclosure for a trial evaluating 2 devices used during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a large metropolitan area.

Attitude to Health↗