PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12739851

Enhancing literacy development through AAC technologies.

Abstract

There is a critical need to understand teaching and technology supports that enable students who use augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) systems to engage in meaningful literacy experiences and foster conventional literacy skills. To thrive in classroom environments, they must have access to tools that can support them in active and independent literacy learning. These students need technology that allows them to move seamlessly between reading, writing, and communicating. They require technology that takes into account access needs, individual learning needs, the learning demands of technology, and literacy development across grades. Families and school teams need information that will assist them in providing the best tools and the most appropriate content within these tools throughout the school day. Teachers need information that supports them in providing exemplary literacy instruction to students who use AAC systems. This article explores and summarizes factors impacting literacy learning, including literacy capabilities of school-age students who use AAC, communication in literacy learning and use, reading and writing instruction in general education classrooms, and technology to support literacy learning. It is important that future technology tools provide a platform for levels of literacy learning: The power of technology will be reflected in its ability to provide access to and display the right content at the right time for students who use AAC. This article summarizes current factors thought to influence literacy learning and discusses priorities for future research and technology development.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Janet M Sturm, Karen Erickson, David E Yoder. 2002. Enhancing literacy development through AAC technologies.. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400435.2002.10132056

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A head movement image (HMI)-controlled computer mouse for people with disabilities.

PURPOSE: This study proposes image processing and microprocessor technology for use in developing a head movement image (HMI)-controlled computer mouse system for the spinal cord injured (SCI). METHOD: The system controls the movement and direction of the mouse cursor by capturing head movement images using a marker installed on the user's headset. In the clinical trial, this new mouse system was compared with an infrared-controlled mouse system on various tasks with nine subjects with SCI. RESULTS: The results were favourable to the new mouse system. The differences between the new mouse system and the infrared-controlled mouse were reaching statistical significance in each of the test situations (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The HMI-controlled computer mouse improves the input speed. People with disabilities need only wear the headset and move their heads to freely control the movement of the mouse cursor.

Communication Devices for People with Disabilities↗

A brain-computer interface (BCI) for the locked-in: comparison of different EEG classifications for the thought translation device.

OBJECTIVE: The Thought Translation Device (TTD) for brain-computer interaction was developed to enable totally paralyzed patients to communicate. Patients learn to regulate slow cortical potentials (SCPs) voluntarily with feedback training to select letters. This study reports the comparison of different methods of electroencephalographic (EEG) analysis to improve spelling accuracy with the TTD on a data set of 6,650 trials of a severely paralyzed patient. METHODS: Selections of letters occurred by exceeding a certain SCP amplitude threshold. To enhance the patient's control of an additional event-related cortical potential, a filter with two filter characteristics ('mixed filter') was developed and applied on-line. To improve performance off-line the criterion for threshold-related decisions was varied. Different types of discriminant analysis were applied to the EEG data set as well as on wavelet transformed EEG data. RESULTS: The mixed filter condition increased the patients' performance on-line compared to the SCP filter alone. A threshold, based on the ratio between required selections and rejections, resulted in a further improvement off-line. Discriminant analysis of both time-series SCP data and wavelet transformed data increased the patient's correct response rate off-line. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to communicate with event-related potentials using the mixed filter feedback method. As wavelet transformed data cannot be fed back on-line before the end of a trial, they are applicable only if immediate feedback is not necessary for a brain-computer interface (BCI). For future BCIs, wavelet transformed data should serve for BCIs without immediate feedback. A stepwise wavelet transformation would even allow immediate feedback.

Communication Devices for People with Disabilities↗

Was blind but now I see.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Communication Devices for People with Disabilities↗