PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12752878

Clinical practice in a computer world: considering the issues.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In an era when information technology developments are being harnessed by governments to improve patient care, it is important to consider the issues raised by the use of computers in health care practice and policy. AIM: The aim of this paper is to provide an appraisal of considerations raised by the use of computers in health care. REVIEW FOCUS: Drawing on a range of studies in the social and medical sciences, the paper reviews the considerations. The introduction to the paper maps out the policy context, which is followed by three substantive sections: first, computer hardware and software considerations; second, issues around confidentiality; and third, personal, social and cultural considerations. CONCLUSION: This paper demonstrates that information technology developments must be allied with government or state direction and should be informed by evidence. Whilst the issues discussed are of primary relevance to the United Kingdom National Health Service, they have wider relevance to health care systems internationally.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Rhidian A Hughes. 2003. Clinical practice in a computer world: considering the issues.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02625.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Evaluation of an intelligent tutoring system in pathology: effects of external representation on performance gains, metacognition, and acceptance.

OBJECTIVE: Determine effects of computer-based tutoring on diagnostic performance gains, meta-cognition, and acceptance using two different problem representations. Describe impact of tutoring on spectrum of diagnostic skills required for task performance. Identify key features of student-tutor interaction contributing to learning gains. DESIGN: Prospective, between-subjects study, controlled for participant level of training. Resident physicians in two academic pathology programs spent four hours using one of two interfaces which differed mainly in external problem representation. The case-focused representation provided an open-learning environment in which students were free to explore evidence-hypothesis relationships within a case, but could not visualize the entire diagnostic space. The knowledge-focused representation provided an interactive representation of the entire diagnostic space, which more tightly constrained student actions. MEASUREMENTS: Metrics included results of pretest, post-test and retention-test for multiple choice and case diagnosis tests, ratios of performance to student reported certainty, results of participant survey, learning curves, and interaction behaviors during tutoring. RESULTS: Students had highly significant learning gains after one tutoring session. Learning was retained at one week. There were no differences between the two interfaces in learning gains on post-test or retention test. Only students in the knowledge-focused interface exhibited significant metacognitive gains from pretest to post-test and pretest to retention test. Students rated the knowledge-focused interface significantly higher than the case-focused interface. CONCLUSIONS: Cognitive tutoring is associated with improved diagnostic performance in a complex medical domain. The effect is retained at one-week post-training. Knowledge-focused external problem representation shows an advantage over case-focused representation for metacognitive effects and user acceptance.

Attitude to Computers↗