PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12755169

Bone graft substitutes.

John A McAuliffe
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A better understanding of the biology of fracture healing and an increasing awareness of the limitations and potential complications of autogenous bone graft harvest have combined to foster a burgeoning interest in the development of bone graft substitutes. A few of these materials have been available for more than a decade, and many more should become available in the near future. The characteristics of the ideal bone graft substitute may vary considerably depending on the intended site of application and the clinical setting in which it is used. Knowledge of the available alternatives is a necessary prerequisite to informed decision making.

Explore related subjects

Bone SubstitutesBone TransplantationFractures, BoneHumansRadiographyWound HealingJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

John A McAuliffe. Bone graft substitutes.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0894-1130(03)80013-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

SEM and 3D synchrotron radiation micro-tomography in the study of bioceramic scaffolds for tissue-engineering applications.

Different biomaterials have been proposed as scaffolds for the delivery of cells and/or biological molecules to repair or regenerate damaged or diseased bone tissues. Particular attention is being given to porous bioceramics that mimic trabecular bone chemistry and structure. Chemical composition, density, pore shape, pore size, and pore interconnection are elements that have to be considered to improve the efficiency of these biomaterials. Commonly, two-dimensional (2D) systems of analysis such as scanning electron microscope (SEM) are used for the characterization and comparison of the scaffolds. Unfortunately, these systems do not allow a complete investigation of the three-dimensional (3D) spatial structure of the scaffold. In this study, we have considered two different techniques, that is, SEM and 3D synchrotron radiation (SR) micro-CT to extract information on the geometry of two hydroxyapatite (HA) bioceramics with identical chemical composition but different micro-porosity, pore size distribution, and pore interconnection pathway. The two scaffolds were obtained with two different procedures: (a) sponge matrix embedding (scaffold FB), and (b) foaming (scaffold EP). Both scaffolds showed structures suitable for tissue-engineering applications, but scaffold EP appeared superior with regard to interconnection of pores, surface on which the new bone could be deposited, and percentage of volume available to bone deposition.

Bone Substitutes↗
PubMed2007

Nanomechanical analysis of bone tissue engineering scaffolds.

Copolymers of (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (HEMA) and methacrylamide monomers conjugated with amino acids were synthesized and crosslinked with ethylene glycol dimethacrylate. The resulting library of copolymers was mineralized in vitro using two distinct methods. In the first mineralization method, the copolymers were polymerized in the presence of a sub-micron hydroxyapatite (HA) suspension. In the second method, copolymers were mineralized with HA using a urea-mediated process. The mechanical properties of all of the copolymers, both mineralized and not, were determined using nanoindentation under both load and displacement control. A power law fit to the initial unloading curve was used to determine a reduced elastic modulus for each material. Between 30 and 300 indentations were performed on each material, and ANOVA analysis was run to determine the statistical significance of differences in modulus between samples. Using nanoindentation, the 22 different samples had reduced modulus values ranging from 840 MPa to 4.14 GPa. Aspartic acid-methacrylate (Asp-MA) copolymers were not distinguishable from the pHEMA control material. Polymerization in the presence of HA created a more uniform material than the urea method of mineralization. Several challenges and solutions encountered in the nanomechanical testing of soft, heterogeneous materials are discussed. These results demonstrate that with proper experimental design, the mechanical properties of tissue engineering scaffold materials based on polymer-ceramic composite materials can be determined using small samples and nanoindentation techniques.

Bone Substitutes↗
PubMed2007

Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanograined hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate containing calcium titanate.

Depending on the coating method utilized and subsequent heat treatments (such as through the use of plasma-spray deposition), inter-diffusion of atomic species across titanium (Ti) and hydroxyapatite (HA) coatings may result. These events may lead to structural and compositional changes that consequently cause unanticipated HA phase transformations which may clearly influence the performance of an orthopedic implant. Thus, the objective of the present in vitro study was to compare the cytocompatibility properties of chemistries that may form at the Ti:HA interface, specifically HA, tricalcium phosphate (TCP), HA doped with Ti, and those containing calcium titanate (CaTiO(3)). In doing so, results of this study showed that osteoblast (bone-forming cells) adhesion increased with greater CaTiO(3) substitutions in either HA or TCP. Specifically, osteoblast adhesion on HA and TCP composites with CaTiO(3) was almost 4.5 times higher than that over pure HA. Material characterization studies revealed that enhanced osteoblast adhesion on these compacts may be due to increasing shrinkage in the unit lattice parameters and decreasing grain size. Although all CaTiO(3) composites exhibited excellent osteoblast adhesion results, Ca(9)HPO(4)(PO(4))(5)OH phase transformation into TCP/CaTiO(3) increased osteoblast adhesion the most; because of these reasons, these materials should be further studied for orthopedic applications.

Bone Substitutes↗