PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12784805

Evaluating graduate programs in bioethics: what measures should we use?

Glenn McGee·David Magnus·Kelly Carroll
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

BioethicsData CollectionEducation, GraduateEmploymentEthicistsFacultyHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationMEDLINEProgram EvaluationBIOETHICSLINEBioethics and Professional EthicsEditorial

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Glenn McGee, David Magnus, Kelly Carroll. 2002. Evaluating graduate programs in bioethics: what measures should we use?. https://doi.org/10.1162/152651602320957259

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

High hopes and automatic escalators: a critique of some new arguments in bioethics.

Two protechnology arguments, the "hopeful principle" and the "automatic escalator", often used in bioethics, are identified and critically analysed in this paper. It is shown that the hopeful principle is closely related to the problematic precautionary principle, and the automatic escalator argument has close affinities to the often criticised empirical slippery slope argument. The hopeful principle is shown to be really hopeless as an argument, and automatic escalator arguments often lead nowhere when critically analysed. These arguments should therefore only be used with great caution.

Bioethics↗