PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 12885202

Bladder reconstruction--from cells to materials.

Abstract

Surgical reconstruction of the urinary bladder is performed on patients of all ages for a diverse range of conditions, including congenital abnormalities, bladder dysfunction, trauma and cancer. The most common material utilized to augment or replace the bladder during these procedures is a segment of the patient's own intestine. However, this procedure ('enterocytoplasty') is associated with significant clinical complications that arise due to the exposure of the epithelial lining of the intestine to urine. A number of alternative approaches are being actively developed to find a practical and functional substitute for native bladder tissue. These range from 'composite enterocystoplasty', where the de-epithelialized intestine wall is lined with bladder epithelial cells that have been propagated in vitro, to augmenting the urinary system with natural or synthetic biomaterials that may incorporate in vitro-propagated cells. However, if tissue-engineered products are to have therapeutic application in bladder reconstruction, a number of issues remain to be addressed; these issues are discussed briefly below.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Southgate, W Cross, I Eardley, D F M Thomas, L K Trejdosiewicz. 2003. Bladder reconstruction--from cells to materials.. https://doi.org/10.1243/095441103322060776

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Osteochondral tissue engineering.

Osteochondral defects (i.e., defects which affect both the articular cartilage and underlying subchondral bone) are often associated with mechanical instability of the joint, and therefore with the risk of inducing osteoarthritic degenerative changes. Current surgical limits in the treatment of complex joint lesions could be overcome by grafting osteochondral composite tissues, engineered by combining the patient's own cells with three-dimensional (3D) porous biomaterials of pre-defined size and shape. Various strategies have been reported for the engineering of osteochondral composites, which result from the use of one or more cell types cultured into single-component or composite scaffolds in a broad spectrum of compositions and biomechanical properties. The variety of concepts and models proposed by different groups for the generation of osteochondral grafts reflects that understanding of the requirements to restore a normal joint function is still poor. In order to introduce the use of engineered osteochondral composites in the routine clinical practice, it will be necessary to comprehensively address a number of critical issues, including those related to the size and shape of the graft to be generated, the cell type(s) and properties of the scaffold(s) to be used, the potential physical conditioning to be applied, the degree of functionality required, and the strategy for a cost-effective manufacturing. The progress made in material science, cell biology, mechanobiology and bioreactor technology will be key to support advances in this challenging field.

Bioartificial Organs↗

Tissue engineering and cartilage regeneration for auricular reconstruction.

OBJECTIVE: This paper will provide (a) a review on current status of auricular reconstruction (b) particularly focusing on the current data about pinna reconstruction using stem cells in combination with tissue engineering. METHODS: The paper is divided into two sections. The first section presents a brief overview of the current status of auricular reconstruction. In the second section, the authors review the aspects and the current status of stem cells and tissue engineering researches related to cartilage regeneration. CONCLUSIONS: Total auricular reconstruction represents one of the greatest challenges for the ENT and Facial Plastic surgeon. The matter of auricular cartilage reconstruction is complex, and progresses in material designs as well as in stem cells field are essential. Even if this bio-technology field is promising, the progresses still are not adequate as patient expectations remain high.

Bioartificial Organs↗

Tissue engineering of vascular conduits.

BACKGROUND: Autologous conduits are not available in up to 40 per cent of patients with arteriopathy who require coronary or lower limb revascularization, and access sites for renal dialysis may eventually become exhausted. Synthetic prostheses achieve a poor patency rate in small-calibre anastomoses. This review examines how vascular tissue engineering may be used to address these issues. METHODS: A Medline search was performed, using the keywords "vascular tissue engineering", "small diameter vascular conduit", "vascular cell biology", "biomechanics", "cell seeding" and "graft endothelialization". Key references were hand-searched for relevant papers. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: In vitro and in vivo approaches are currently being used for guided cell repopulation of both biological and synthetic scaffolds. The major clinical problem has been extended culture time (approximately 6 weeks), which precludes their use in the acute setting. However, recent advances have led not only to improved patency rates for prostheses, but also to a potential reduction in culture time. In addition, increased mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells in the presence of ischaemic tissue may increase the autologous cell yield for scaffold reseeding with further reduction in culture time.

Bioartificial Organs↗