PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 12894609

Panic in the emergency room.

Patrick Lynch·Kim M Galbraith
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This paper examines the relation between coronary artery disease (CAD) and panic disorder (PD), discusses the implications of this relation to the general medical system, and suggests future assessment and intervention strategies for emergency departments. METHOD: We reviewed the literature on CAD and PD using Medline and PsycINFO. RESULTS: PD is more expensive to our nonpsychiatric, general medical system than any other psychiatric condition. The main reason for PD patients' continued use of general medicine for their psychological symptoms is that their PD remains undiagnosed. In the emergency room (ER), PD patients with chest pain have their PD go undiagnosed about 98% of the time. By having ERs implement specific assessment and intervention strategies for patients presenting with chest pain, the savings to the general medical system could be substantial. CONCLUSIONS: By improving recognition of PD in the ER, there is the potential to generate large savings in general medical care. With the availability of empirically supported or effective psychological and pharmacologic treatments for PD, appropriately diagnosing and subsequently treating patients with PD may prevent them from experiencing many years of disability and higher rates of fatal coronary events.

Explore related subjects

Chest PainCost-Benefit AnalysisDiagnostic ErrorsEmergency Medical ServicesHealth Care CostsHumansPanic DisorderJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Patrick Lynch, Kim M Galbraith. 2003. Panic in the emergency room.. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370304800601

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Impact of a negative prior stress test on emergency physician disposition decision in ED patients with chest pain syndromes.

OBJECTIVE: Many emergency department (ED) patients with potential acute coronary syndromes (ACS) have prior visits and prior cardiac testing; however, the effect of knowledge of prior testing on the emergency physician disposition decision making is not known. We studied the impact of prior noninvasive testing (ie, stress testing) for myocardial ischemia on disposition decision making in ED patients with potential ACS. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study of ED patients with chest pain who received an electrocardiogram for potential ACS. Data included demographics, medical history, stress test history, and TIMI risk score. Patients were followed in-house; 30-day telephone interviews were performed for follow-up. Main outcomes were ED disposition (admit/discharge) and a composite of 30-day death, acute myocardial infarction, and revascularization stratified on the basis of prior stress testing known at the time of presentation. Standard statistical techniques were used with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: There were 1853 patients enrolled and 97% had follow-up. Patients had a mean age of 53 +/- 14 years; 60% were women, 67% were black. There were 1491 (79%) patients without a prior stress test, 291 (16%) had a normal prior stress test result, and 89 (5%) had an abnormal prior stress test result. Admission rates were 92% (95% CI, 87%-98%) for patients with a prior abnormal stress test, 73% (95% CI, 67%-78%) for patients with a normal prior stress test, and 70% (95% CI, 67%-72%) for patients without a prior stress test. Adverse outcomes were the highest among patients with prior abnormal stress test but did not differ significantly between patients with no prior stress test and patients with prior normal stress test (10.1% [95% CI, 3.6-16.7%] vs 5.2% [95% CI, 4.1-6.4%] vs 4.8% [95% CI, 2.4-7.3%]). CONCLUSION: Patients without prior stress tests and patients with prior normal stress tests were admitted for potential ACS at the same rate and had the same 30-day cardiovascular event rates. This suggests that prior stress testing does not affect subsequent disposition decisions. Perhaps cardiac catheterization or computed tomography coronary angiograms would have more of an impact on subsequent visits, making them potentially more cost-effective in the low-risk patient.

Chest Pain↗
PubMed2007

Hypothesis: chest pain in primary spontaneous pneumothorax.

The mechanism of chest pain in spontaneous pneumothorax has never been discussed in the literature. It is proposed that this is due to acute parietal pleural irritation secondary to leakage of inflammatory material following bleb rupture, rather than the presence of interpleural air.

Chest Pain↗