PubMed · 13327021
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J FIOL-BIGAS. 1956. Hydrops corneae from keratoconus.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13327021/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
PURPOSE: To compare the performance of sonic phacoemulsification with that of ultrasonic phacoemulsification in regard to 1-day postoperative visual acuity, corneal edema, and procedure efficiency. SETTING: Oregon Eye Institute, Eugene, Oregon, USA. METHODS: This prospective nonrandomized study comprised 86 eyes with mild to moderate nuclear sclerotic cataract. Forty-three eyes had sonic and 43 ultrasonic phacoemulsification using the Staar Sonic Wave phacoemulsification system. The mean age was 76 years in the ultrasonic group and 71 years in the sonic group. The mean nuclear sclerosis was 2.0+ in the sonic group and 1.9+ in the ultrasonic group. Patient age, lens density, postoperative corneal edema, 1-day postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), and the percentage of eyes with a visual acuity of 20/40 or better were determined. In addition, the mean ultrasonic and sonic times, mean percentage phaco power, and mean effective phaco time (EPT) were calculated in each group. RESULTS: Both groups had a 5% incidence of trace corneal edema. The mean UCVA was 20/41 in the ultrasonic group and 20/42 in the sonic group. Seventy-nine percent of eyes in the ultrasonic group and 74% in the sonic group had a UCVA of 20/40. The mean percentage phaco power was 7.2% and 7.6% in the ultrasonic group and sonic group, respectively. The mean EPT was low in both groups, 4.0 and 2.9 seconds, respectively. CONCLUSION: Sonic technology yielded outcomes similar to those of ultrasonic phacoemulsification with respect to postoperative visual acuity and corneal edema in patients with average density nuclear sclerotic cataract.
PURPOSE: To assess the quality of processed ophthalmic instruments and look for the presence of foreign material on the surface of these instruments. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected on the presence of debris on processed instruments in the trays used for phacoemulsification surgery. All instruments were examined under an operating microscope before use and details of the types of debris on the various instruments were noted. If debris was found, a new tray was opened to obtain a clean instrument. RESULTS: Forty-seven trays were opened for use during the study period. Deposits on instruments were found in 29 (62%) trays. These were mainly present on the intraocular lens introducers. Loose fibres were found on instruments from eight (17%) trays. Debris was found in the aspiration channels of three (6%) hand pieces. CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of processed ophthalmic instruments had debris on their surfaces. To reduce the risk of intraocular inflammation and of transmission of prion diseases the instruments should go through a thorough decontamination process before sterilization. Routine mechanical cleaning at the end of surgery and ultrasonic cleaning before sterilization should reduce the occurrence of debris on the instruments. Instruments should also be inspected under the operating microscope before use.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.