PubMed · 13362813
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
E L COOPER. 1956. Accommodation and convergence.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13362813/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
There has been no comprehensive study involving each of the primary dynamic components of accommodation in the same cohort as related to age and presbyopic onset; furthermore, the current findings are equivocal. Dynamic monocular components of accommodation (latency, time constant, peak velocity/amplitude relationship, and microfluctuations) were assessed objectively using an infrared optometer within the linear region of accommodation in 30 visually-normal human subjects aged 21-50 years. The time constant and the peak velocity/amplitude relationship did not change with age. However, latency progressively increased, and microfluctuation amplitude and frequency progressively decreased, with increasing age. The invariance in time constant suggests that the gross biomechanical aspects of the lens and related structures in the remaining linear region are relatively unaffected by age. In contrast, the decrease in microfluctuation activity with age suggests more subtle alterations in the biomechanical aspects of the lens to these very small perturbations, such as a response amplitude non-linearity. With respect to neurologic control, the progressive latency increase suggests a processing delay of the blur input, and this is consistent with age-related changes in reaction time measures. The lack of any age-related changes in the peak velocity/amplitude relationship implies normalcy of central and peripheral neuromotor control, as well as grossly normal first-order lens biomechanics, in this linear response region. The results are consistent with the Hess-Gullstrand theory of presbyopia.
The aim of the experiment was to test for a contribution from short-wavelength sensitive cones to the static and step accommodation response, to compare responses from short and long- plus middle-wavelength sensitive cone types, and to examine the contribution of a signal from longitudinal chromatic aberration to the accommodation response. Accommodation was monitored continuously (eight subjects) to a square-wave grating (2.2 c/d; 0.57 contrast) in a Badal optometer. The grating stepped (1.00 D) randomly towards or away from the eye from a starting position of 2.00 D. Five illumination conditions were used to isolate cone responses, and combine them with or without longitudinal chromatic aberration. Accuracy of the response before the step, step amplitude, latencies and time-constants, were compared between conditions using single factor ANOVA and t-test comparisons. Both S-cones and LM-cones mediated static and step accommodation responses. S-cone contrast drives "static" accommodation for near, but the S-cone response is too slow to influence step dynamics when LM-cones participate.
PURPOSE: Phenylephrine is used to dilate the iris through alpha-adrenergic stimulation of the iris dilator muscle. Sympathetic stimulation of the ciliary muscle is believed to be inhibitory, decreasing accommodative amplitude. Investigations in humans have suggested some loss of functional accommodation after phenylephrine. It is unclear whether this loss is due to direct action of phenylephrine on the ciliary muscle or to secondary optical factors associated with mydriasis. The purpose of this study was to determine whether phenylephrine affects Edinger-Westphal (EW)-stimulated accommodation in rhesus monkeys. METHODS: The time course for maximum mydriasis was determined by videographic pupillography after phenylephrine instillation in 10 normal rhesus monkeys. Static and dynamic EW-stimulated accommodative responses were studied in five iridectomized rhesus monkeys before and after phenylephrine instillation. Accommodative amplitude was measured with a Hartinger coincidence refractometer. Dynamic accommodative responses were measured with infrared photorefraction, and functions were fitted to the data to determine peak velocity versus accommodative response relationships. RESULTS: The maximum dilated pupil diameter of 8.39 +/- 0.23 mm occurred 15 minutes after administration of phenylephrine. In iridectomized monkeys, postphenylephrine accommodative amplitudes were similar to prephenylephrine amplitudes. Dynamic analysis of the accommodative responses showed linear peak velocity versus accommodative amplitude relationships that were not statistically different before and after phenylephrine. CONCLUSIONS: alpha-Adrenergic stimulation causes a strong pupil dilation in noniridectomized monkey eyes but does not affect EW-stimulated accommodative amplitude or dynamics in anesthetized, iridectomized rhesus monkeys.