PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 13834061

[Tuberculosis recurrences].

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J STEIGER. 1959. [Tuberculosis recurrences].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13834061/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

National biometry audit.

PURPOSE: To determine compliance with the Royal College of Ophthalmologists' (RCOphth) biometry guidelines. METHOD: A structured telephone questionnaire of individuals who perform biometry in all eye departments in the United Kingdom (UK). RESULTS: A biometrist was interviewed in 107 of the UK's 178 eye departments. Nurses alone run the biometry service in 58% of departments, orthoptists alone in 13%, junior doctors alone in 6%, optometrists alone in 3%, and a combination of staff in 20%. Of the staff interviewed, 37% had been on external biometry training courses. One intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formula was used for all eyes in 61% of departments with 17% using the obsolete SRK II formula, 36% of departments used two or more formulae and only 4% adhered to the RCOphth guidelines to use Hoffer Q in eyes with axial lengths <22.0 mm, an average of all three formulae in eyes between 22.0 and 24.5 mm, Holladay in eyes between 24.6 and 26.0 mm, and SRK/T in eyes >26.0 mm. Audit of refractive results was claimed by 71% of units but in only 17 (16%) did the biometrist know the percentage of eyes with a prediction error <or=1 D. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates poor awareness and/or implementation of the RCOphth biometry guidelines and indicates that audits are either not highlighting poor results or are not resulting in a change in practice. The guidelines should be updated to emphasise the importance of customising A constants and to set benchmark standards for prediction error.

Biometry↗

Intraocular pressure associations with refractive error and axial length in children.

AIM: To assess whether intraocular pressure (IOP) is associated with refractive error or axial length in children. METHODS: Of subjects from the Singapore Cohort Study of the Risk Factors for Myopia (SCORM), 636 Chinese children aged 9-11 years from two elementary schools underwent non-contact tonometry, cycloplegic autorefraction, and A-scan biometry during 2001. For analyses, refractive error was categorised into four groups; hypermetropia (spherical equivalent refraction (SE) > or = +1.0D), emmetropia (-0.5D<SE< +1.0D), low myopia (-3.0D<SE< or = -0.5D) and high myopia (SE< or = -3.0D). RESULTS: Of the 636 children examined, 50.6% were male. The mean IOP was 16.6 (SD 2.7) mm Hg. There were no significant IOP differences between low (mean IOP = 16.4 (2.8) mm Hg) or high myopes (16.7 (2.5) mm Hg) and emmetropes (16.7 (2.9) mm Hg), p = 0.57. IOP was not correlated with spherical equivalent refraction (Spearman correlation, r = 0.009) or axial length (r = 0.030). In regression analyses adjusting for diastolic blood pressure, neither spherical equivalent (regression coefficient = 0.014) nor axial length (regression coefficient = 0.027) were significantly associated with IOP. CONCLUSION: These findings do not support an association between IOP and refractive error or axial length in children. This questions postulated roles of IOP in the pathogenesis of myopia.

Biometry↗

Advanced statistics: linear regression, part I: simple linear regression.

Simple linear regression is a mathematical technique used to model the relationship between a single independent predictor variable and a single dependent outcome variable. In this, the first of a two-part series exploring concepts in linear regression analysis, the four fundamental assumptions and the mechanics of simple linear regression are reviewed. The most common technique used to derive the regression line, the method of least squares, is described. The reader will be acquainted with other important concepts in simple linear regression, including: variable transformations, dummy variables, relationship to inference testing, and leverage. Simplified clinical examples with small datasets and graphic models are used to illustrate the points. This will provide a foundation for the second article in this series: a discussion of multiple linear regression, in which there are multiple predictor variables.

Biometry↗