PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 1411607

[Can post-traumatic renal failure be modified therapeutically?].

Abstract

Acute renal failure in the late phase after severe trauma is particularly dangerous, since it is resistant to therapy and contributes to the development of post-traumatic multiple organ failure. We have studied different treatment regimes in order to establish whether late renal failure can be prevented (study A: colloidal and crystalloid solutions; study B greater than: crystalloid solutions and dopamine; continuous infusion 3 micrograms/kg body weight). Renal function was assessed by means of the score by Goris as well as by creatinine clearance over a period of 14 days. Haemodynamics and cardiac function were determined on a daily basis. The demographic parameters were comparable in both groups. In group A 37 of 61 patients died (60.6%), and in group B 17 of 38 patients (44.7%) (P less than 0.05). The incidence of impairment of renal function was comparable; in group A there was significantly more severe damage (18%) compared to group B (2.6%). This coincided with significantly higher mortality in group A (group A: 60.65%; group B: 44.7%). In group A a lesser volume was given during the preclinical and clinical course, even after correcting for the volume-saving effect of colloidal solutions. In addition, cardiac index was higher in group B (day 9: 5.9 +/- 0.61 l/min) than in group A (day 9: 4.4 +/- 0.5 l/min) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) was lower and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) higher over the whole period. Also, the arterio-venous oxygen difference (AvDO2) was higher following day 9 in patients in group A, but creatinine clearance was better in group B patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H C Pape, G Regel, J A Sturm, H Tscherne. 1992. [Can post-traumatic renal failure be modified therapeutically?].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1411607/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The identification of novel potential injury mechanisms and candidate biomarkers in renal allograft rejection by quantitative proteomics.

Early transplant dysfunction and failure because of immunological and nonimmunological factors still presents a significant clinical problem for transplant recipients. A critical unmet need is the noninvasive detection and prediction of immune injury such that acute injury can be reversed by proactive immunosuppression titration. In this study, we used iTRAQ -based proteomic discovery and targeted ELISA validation to discover and validate candidate urine protein biomarkers from 262 renal allograft recipients with biopsy-confirmed allograft injury. Urine samples were randomly split into a training set of 108 patients and an independent validation set of 154 patients, which comprised the clinical biopsy-confirmed phenotypes of acute rejection (AR) (n = 74), stable graft (STA) (n = 74), chronic allograft injury (CAI) (n = 58), BK virus nephritis (BKVN) (n = 38), nephrotic syndrome (NS) (n = 8), and healthy, normal control (HC) (n = 10). A total of 389 proteins were measured that displayed differential abundances across urine specimens of the injury types (p < 0.05) with a significant finding that SUMO2 (small ubiquitin-related modifier 2) was identified as a "hub" protein for graft injury irrespective of causation. Sixty-nine urine proteins had differences in abundance (p < 0.01) in AR compared with stable graft, of which 12 proteins were up-regulated in AR with a mean fold increase of 2.8. Nine urine proteins were highly specific for AR because of their significant differences (p < 0.01; fold increase >1.5) from all other transplant categories (HLA class II protein HLA-DRB1, KRT14, HIST1H4B, FGG, ACTB, FGB, FGA, KRT7, DPP4). Increased levels of three of these proteins, fibrinogen beta (FGB; p = 0.04), fibrinogen gamma (FGG; p = 0.03), and HLA DRB1 (p = 0.003) were validated by ELISA in AR using an independent sample set. The fibrinogen proteins further segregated AR from BK virus nephritis (FGB p = 0.03, FGG p = 0.02), a finding that supports the utility of monitoring these urinary proteins for the specific and sensitive noninvasive diagnosis of acute renal allograft rejection.

Acute Kidney Injury

[Renal crisis in scleroderma].

A case is described of a 30-year-old woman with scleroderma renal crisis. She presented with classical symptoms: malignant hypertension of sudden onset and rapidly progressive renal failure. End-stage renal failure developed in spite of treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and the patient became dialysis-dependent. Five years later her condition was still stable. She lived in a nursing home, severely disabled but mentally healthy. A renal crisis is one of the most life threatening complications of scleroderma. By immediate treatment with ACE inhibitors, dependence on haemodialysis can be prevented in half the patients.

Acute Kidney Injury

Plasma endothelin immunoreactivity in liver disease and the hepatorenal syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Severe renal vasoconstriction is central to the pathogenesis of renal failure in the hepatorenal syndrome. Endothelin-1 and endothelin-3 are potent, long-acting vasoconstrictors, and endothelin-1 has selective potency as a renal vasoconstrictor. These properties suggest a role for endothelins in the hepatorenal syndrome. METHODS: We measured plasma endothelin-1 and endothelin-3 concentrations using specific radioimmunoassays in subjects with hepatorenal syndrome, liver disease but normal renal function, chronic renal failure, acute renal failure, liver dysfunction and renal impairment, or normal liver and kidney function. RESULTS: The patients with the hepatorenal syndrome had markedly elevated mean (+/- SE) plasma concentrations of endothelin-1 (36 +/- 5 ng per liter [14.5 +/- 1.8 pmol per liter]) and endothelin-3 (43 +/- 3 ng per liter [16.3 +/- 1.0 pmol per liter]) as compared with the normal subjects (endothelin-1, 4 +/- 1 ng per liter [1.7 +/- 0.2 pmol per liter]; and endothelin-3, 18 +/- 1 ng per liter [6.8 +/- 0.4 pmol per liter]; P < 0.001) and with the patients in the other four groups (P < 0.001 to P < 0.05). The plasma endothelin-1, but not endothelin-3, concentrations in these four patient groups were significantly higher than in the normal subjects (P < 0.001 to P < 0.05). The concentrations of endothelin-1 in renal arterial plasma and renal venous plasma, measured in five patients with the hepatorenal syndrome and three with chronic liver disease and normal renal function, were 20 +/- 4 ng per liter (7.9 +/- 1.8 pmol per liter) and 24 +/- 4 ng per liter (9.5 +/- 1.5 pmol per liter), respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The increase in plasma endothelin-1 and endothelin-3 concentrations in patients with the hepatorenal syndrome is consistent with the hypothesis that these substances have a role in the pathogenesis of the disease.

Acute Kidney Injury