PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 1413284

[Initial experiences with the humerus interlocking nail].

H Habernek·L Schmid·E Orthner
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A preliminary report is given on the good results of eleven patients, who had been treated with a locking nail for a fracture of the humerus at three different trauma departments. No non-union, infection or radial palsy has been seen nor was there any neurovascular complication intraoperatively. Four patients had misalignments of up to 15 degrees, whereof three of them had combined varus-recurvation-angulations without functional or cosmetic sequelae. All but one had excellent functional results six months postoperatively. Bone healing could be confirmed three months postoperatively. Only transverse and spiral fractures of the second to fifth sixth had been treated until now, though open fractures up to the second degree can be managed too. Finally, some technical issues are considered, which include a better guiding device, the use of cancellous screws for proximal looking, a more oblique position of one of the proximal screwholes to obtain some kind of interfragmentary compression for appropriate fractures, and the use of a Williams-screwdriver.

Explore related subjects

Bone NailsBone ScrewsFollow-Up StudiesFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryFracture HealingFractures, ClosedHumansHumeral FracturesPostoperative ComplicationsRadiographySurgical InstrumentsJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Habernek, L Schmid, E Orthner. 1992. [Initial experiences with the humerus interlocking nail].. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02588186

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1996

Convex spinal epiphysiodesis in the management of progressive infantile idiopathic scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of patient records with current clinical and radiographic assessment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term result of anterior and posterior convex spinal growth arrest, with or without instrumentation, in managing infantile idiopathic scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There were 12 male and 10 female patients studied, with a mean follow-up period of 10 years, 9 months. The mean Cobb angle before surgery was 65 degrees. All had a rib vertebral angle difference more than 20 degrees. The mean age at surgery was 6 years. Nine patients had epiphysiodesis alone; nine patients also underwent Harrington instrumentation simultaneously, and four underwent Harrington instrumentation 2-4 years later. METHOD: Clinical evaluation and sequential measurements of Cobb angle were done. RESULTS: The epiphysiodesis-only group had a mean preoperative Cobb angle of 72 degrees, mean progression of curves of +12 degrees, and mean rate of progression of +2.5 degrees per year: the group's postoperative figures were 92 degrees, +15 degrees, and +3 degrees per year, respectively. The epiphysiodesis and late Harrington rod group had a mean preoperative Cobb angle of 56 degrees, mean progression of +12 degrees, and a mean rate of progression of +5 degrees per year; the group's postoperative Cobb angle averaged 62 degrees, progression +6 degrees, and rate of progression +1 degree per year. The epiphysiodesis with simultaneous Harrington rod group had a preoperative mean Cobb angle of 60 degrees, mean progression of +18 degrees, and mean rate of progression of +6 degrees per years. After surgery, these improved to 58 degrees, correction of 2 degrees, and rate of correction of 0.5 degree per year. CONCLUSION: Combined anterior and posterior convex spinal growth arrest alone does not prevent progression of deformity in infantile idiopathic scoliosis. The addition of posterior instrumentation can slow or arrest deformity progression but not reverse it.

Bone Nails↗
PubMed1996

The safety and efficacy of the Isola Spinal Implant System for the surgical treatment of degenerative disc disease. A prospective study.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a prospective study designed in consultation with and approved by the Food and Drug Administration with the purpose of determining the safety and efficacy of the Isola Spinal Implant System for the surgical treatment of patients with degenerative disc disease. OBJECTIVES: To report the results of the degenerative disc disease group from the Isola Investigational Device Exemption study, which was done to determine whether the Isola Spinal Implant System is a safe and effective treatment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The safety and efficacy of transpedicular instrumentation as an adjunct in achieving lumbar spine fusion are still debated. METHODS: Hospital Investigational Review Board approval of the study protocol was obtained at the 10 participating centers. One hundred twenty patients (49 men and 71 women; average age, 54 years [range, 25-83 years]) were enrolled. Clinical and radiographic follow-up evaluation was done using protocols established prospectively. RESULTS: Of the 120 patients, 12 (10%) had device-related problems. There were two operative and four device related complications after surgery. Six other patients had their implants removed either for local pain (two) or for looseness or breakage (four). Of 118 patients eligible for follow-up evaluation at 24 months, 107 (91%) were available for study. Fusion was achieved in 97 (91%) patients. Average combined function and pain scores improved by 2.6 points (P < 0.0001). Clinical success, as measured by combining function and pain scores, was achieved in 65% of the patients by the most stringent criteria and 73% by less stringent criteria. Clinical success was significantly higher in patients who had not had previous surgery than in those who had, 77% versus 57% (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that the Isola Spinal Implant System can be safely used, is an effective adjunct in the achievement of fusion, and yields an acceptable number of successful clinical outcomes, especially when considering the preponderance of previously operated patients included in this group.

Bone Nails↗