PubMed · 14231509
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M VIZCAINOMORA, M A MARTINEZ. 1964. [VARIATION IN THE ETHER FORMOL CONCENTRATION METHOD].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14231509/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
The activation of intracerebral corticotropin releasing factor (CRF) system is involved in nitrous oxide analgesia. We evaluated the effect of general anesthetics on nitrous-oxide-induced CRF activation and antinociception. Male Sprague-Dawley rats inhaled isoflurane (0%, 0.6%, 1.0% and 1.5%) or were administered with intravenous propofol (0, 0.1 and 0.2 mg/kg/min), with or without 75% nitrous oxide inhalation, for 90 min. The brain was fixed with fixative, and brain sections, including the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, were double immunostained with c-Fos and CRF antibodies to assess the activation of CRF-containing neurons. In other groups of rats, the effect of propofol on nitrous oxide antinociception was evaluated with tail flick latency tests. Both inhaled isoflurane and intravenous propofol inhibited nitrous-oxide-induced activation of CRF neurons, suggesting that these general anesthetics may inhibit one of the analgesic mechanisms of nitrous oxide. Indeed, propofol inhibited the antinociceptive action of nitrous oxide, as evaluated with tail flick latencies (TFL).
The physiological function of L-carnosine (beta-alanyl-L-histidine) synthesized in mammalian muscles has been unclear. Previously, we observed that intravenous (i.v.) injection of L-carnosine suppressed renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) in urethane-anesthetized rats, and L-carnosine administered via the diet inhibited the elevation of blood pressure (BP) in deoxycorticosterone acetate salt hypertensive rats. To identify the mechanism, we examined effects of i.v. or intralateral cerebral ventricular (l.c.v.) injection of various doses of L-carnosine on RSNA and BP in urethane-anesthetized rats. Lower doses (1 microg i.v.; 0.01 microg l.c.v.) of L-carnosine significantly suppressed RSNA and BP, whereas higher doses (100 microg i.v.; 10 microg l.c.v.) elevated RSNA and BP. Furthermore, we examined effects of antagonists of histaminergic (H1 and H3) receptors on L-carnosine-induced effects. When peripherally and centrally given, thioperamide, an H3 receptor antagonist, blocked RSNA and BP decreases induced by the lower doses of peripheral L-carnosine, whereas diphenhydramine, an H1 receptor antagonist, inhibited increases induced by the higher doses of peripheral L-carnosine. Moreover, bilateral lesions of the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus eliminated both effects on RSNA and BP induced by the lower (1 microg) and higher (100 microg) doses of peripheral L-carnosine. These findings suggest that low-dose L-carnosine suppresses and high-dose L-carnosine stimulates RSNA and BP, that the suprachiasmatic nucleus and histaminergic nerve are involved in the activities, and that L-carnosine acts in the brain and possibly other organs.
Propofol and halothane are clinically used general anaesthetics, which are transported primarily by HSA (human serum albumin) in the blood. Binding characteristics are therefore of interest for both the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of these drugs. We characterized anaesthetic-HSA interactions in solution using elution chromatography, ITC (isothermal titration calorimetry), hydrogen-exchange experiments and geometric analyses of high-resolution structures. Binding affinity of propofol to HSA was determined to have a K(d) of 65 microM and a stoichiometry of approx. 2, whereas the binding of halothane to HSA showed a K(d) of 1.6 mM and a stoichiometry of approx. 7. Anaesthetic-HSA interactions are exothermic, with propofol having a larger negative enthalpy change relative to halothane. Hydrogen-exchange studies in isolated recombinant domains of HSA showed that propofol-binding sites are primarily found in domain III, whereas halothane sites are more widely distributed. Both location and stoichiometry from these solution studies agree with data derived from X-ray crystal-structure studies, and further analyses of the architecture of sites from these structures suggested that greater hydrophobic contacts, van der Waals interactions and hydrogen-bond formation account for the stronger binding of propofol as compared with the less potent anaesthetic, halothane.