PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 14342362

BEHAVIORAL CONTRAST DURING MULTIPLE AVOIDANCE SCHEDULES.

G A WERTHEIM
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Changes were observed in the rate of avoidance responding in both components of a multiple schedule of Sidman-avoidance after the shock frequency was changed in only one component. The rate change in each component was positively correlated, in direction and magnitude, with the change in the relative rate of reinforcement (percentage of total shocks) in that component.

Explore related subjects

Avoidance LearningConditioning, PsychologicalElectroshockRatsReinforcement, PsychologyResearchAVOIDANCE LEARNINGCONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY)ELECTROSHOCKEXPERIMENTAL LAB STUDYRATSREINFORCEMENT (PSYCHOLOGY)Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G A WERTHEIM. 1965. BEHAVIORAL CONTRAST DURING MULTIPLE AVOIDANCE SCHEDULES.. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1965.8-269

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Psychometric characteristics of the Spanish version of the FAB questionnaire.

STUDY DESIGN: Validation of a translated, culturally adapted questionnaire. OBJECTIVES: To translate and culturally adapt the Spanish version of the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), and to validate its use in Spanish-speaking patients with low back pain (LBP). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The FABQ is a reliable evaluation instrument for fear avoidance beliefs, which includes two subscales (FAB-Work and FAB-Phys). No validated Spanish version was available. METHODS: Translation/retranslation of the English version of the FABQ was done blindly and independently by a multidisciplinary team. The study was done in 12 primary care centers and 9 hospital outpatient clinics from seven regions in Spain, with 209 acute, subacute, and chronic patients who visited their physician for LBP: 53 in the pilot phase and 156 in the validation phase. Subjects were given the FABQ, two VAS for LBP and referred pain, and the Roland-Morris and SF-12 Questionnaires on their first visit and 14 days later. In the pilot phase, on day 1 test-retest reliability was estimated by giving a second FABQ in which the name and order of the items had been changed. RESULTS: Time necessary to complete the FABQ was [median, P25, P75] 10 minutes (5,15). FABQ values were not normally distributed. Comprehensibility: No request for aid in interpretation was made during the validation phase and no item was left unanswered by >or= 10% of patients. Reliability: Scores [median, P25, P75] of the two FABQ were: 72.00 (47.25, 82.00) and 72.00 (49.50, 83.75), with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.9668 (95% confidence interval, 0.9421,0.9823). Mean of kappa values for all items was 0.743. Internal Consistency: Cronbach's alpha was 0.9337. VALIDITY: Values of FAB and FAB-Work were >37% higher for patients on sick leave. For FAB-Phys differences were below 8%. FABQ, FAB-Work and FAB-Phys strongly correlated with disability on days 1 and 15. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish version of the FABQ has good comprehensibility, internal consistency, and reliability. It cannot be analyzed parametrically, but only nonparametrically. The total FABQ is at least as valid as its subscales and simpler to score, making it more suitable for routine clinical use.

Avoidance Learning↗
PubMed2006

Solving the puzzle of deliberate self-harm: the experiential avoidance model.

Despite increasing attention to the phenomenon of deliberate self-harm (DSH), the literature currently lacks a unifying, evidence-based, theoretical framework within which to understand the factors that control this behavior. The purpose of the present paper is to outline such a framework-the Experiential Avoidance Model (EAM) of DSH. The EAM poses that DSH is primarily maintained by negative reinforcement in the form of escape from, or avoidance of, unwanted emotional experiences. Literature on factors that may lead to experiential avoidance is reviewed, along with the mounting empirical evidence that DSH functions to help the individual escape from unwanted emotional experiences. The EAM integrates a variety of research on emotions, experiential avoidance, and DSH within a clinically useful framework that sparks novel research directions.

Avoidance Learning↗
PubMed2005

Opponent appetitive-aversive neural processes underlie predictive learning of pain relief.

Termination of a painful or unpleasant event can be rewarding. However, whether the brain treats relief in a similar way as it treats natural reward is unclear, and the neural processes that underlie its representation as a motivational goal remain poorly understood. We used fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging) to investigate how humans learn to generate expectations of pain relief. Using a pavlovian conditioning procedure, we show that subjects experiencing prolonged experimentally induced pain can be conditioned to predict pain relief. This proceeds in a manner consistent with contemporary reward-learning theory (average reward/loss reinforcement learning), reflected by neural activity in the amygdala and midbrain. Furthermore, these reward-like learning signals are mirrored by opposite aversion-like signals in lateral orbitofrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex. This dual coding has parallels to 'opponent process' theories in psychology and promotes a formal account of prediction and expectation during pain.

Avoidance Learning↗