PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14370604

The tuberculosis problem today.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A R ALLEN, G E MARCY, J K YU. 1955. The tuberculosis problem today.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14370604/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

National biometry audit.

PURPOSE: To determine compliance with the Royal College of Ophthalmologists' (RCOphth) biometry guidelines. METHOD: A structured telephone questionnaire of individuals who perform biometry in all eye departments in the United Kingdom (UK). RESULTS: A biometrist was interviewed in 107 of the UK's 178 eye departments. Nurses alone run the biometry service in 58% of departments, orthoptists alone in 13%, junior doctors alone in 6%, optometrists alone in 3%, and a combination of staff in 20%. Of the staff interviewed, 37% had been on external biometry training courses. One intraocular lens (IOL) calculation formula was used for all eyes in 61% of departments with 17% using the obsolete SRK II formula, 36% of departments used two or more formulae and only 4% adhered to the RCOphth guidelines to use Hoffer Q in eyes with axial lengths <22.0 mm, an average of all three formulae in eyes between 22.0 and 24.5 mm, Holladay in eyes between 24.6 and 26.0 mm, and SRK/T in eyes >26.0 mm. Audit of refractive results was claimed by 71% of units but in only 17 (16%) did the biometrist know the percentage of eyes with a prediction error <or=1 D. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates poor awareness and/or implementation of the RCOphth biometry guidelines and indicates that audits are either not highlighting poor results or are not resulting in a change in practice. The guidelines should be updated to emphasise the importance of customising A constants and to set benchmark standards for prediction error.

Biometry↗

Intraocular pressure associations with refractive error and axial length in children.

AIM: To assess whether intraocular pressure (IOP) is associated with refractive error or axial length in children. METHODS: Of subjects from the Singapore Cohort Study of the Risk Factors for Myopia (SCORM), 636 Chinese children aged 9-11 years from two elementary schools underwent non-contact tonometry, cycloplegic autorefraction, and A-scan biometry during 2001. For analyses, refractive error was categorised into four groups; hypermetropia (spherical equivalent refraction (SE) > or = +1.0D), emmetropia (-0.5D<SE< +1.0D), low myopia (-3.0D<SE< or = -0.5D) and high myopia (SE< or = -3.0D). RESULTS: Of the 636 children examined, 50.6% were male. The mean IOP was 16.6 (SD 2.7) mm Hg. There were no significant IOP differences between low (mean IOP = 16.4 (2.8) mm Hg) or high myopes (16.7 (2.5) mm Hg) and emmetropes (16.7 (2.9) mm Hg), p = 0.57. IOP was not correlated with spherical equivalent refraction (Spearman correlation, r = 0.009) or axial length (r = 0.030). In regression analyses adjusting for diastolic blood pressure, neither spherical equivalent (regression coefficient = 0.014) nor axial length (regression coefficient = 0.027) were significantly associated with IOP. CONCLUSION: These findings do not support an association between IOP and refractive error or axial length in children. This questions postulated roles of IOP in the pathogenesis of myopia.

Biometry↗