PubMed · 14525811
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Jan M Davies. 2003. Learning from others.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03019368
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVES: To elicit the attitudes and opinions of consultant anaesthetists working in Scotland, with regard to conscious sedation carried out by dental practitioners. METHOD: A questionnaire was designed to gauge opinion of consultant anaesthetists in Scotland on the practice of conscious sedation by dentists. The questionnaire was sent to 353 consultant anaesthetists working in 49 hospitals within the 15 health boards in Scotland. RESULTS: Of the 366 questionnaires sent, 249 were returned of which 235 were valid. This gave a response rate of 64%. In general, those questioned felt that the provision of sedation in a hospital setting was more appropriate than in general dental practice. A majority (65%) thought that it was unrealistic for anaesthetists to provide all sedation for dental treatment, although many (58%) felt that anaesthetists should take more responsibility in this area. Again, a majority (60%) agreed that dentists should be trained to use sedation techniques for their patients but a significant number (63%) disagreed with the practice of operator/sedationist. CONCLUSION: It is of concern to the dental profession that a significant number of anaesthetists do not feel that it is appropriate for dentists to be administering even the most simple methods of sedation. At present there are no clear, recognised guidelines as to the level of formal training required for the practice of conscious sedation by dentists. It is in the interests of the dental profession and the public to ensure that those choosing to practice sedation do so safely by following recognised guidelines in the training and practice of sedation.
BACKGROUND: Anesthesiology departments incur staffing costs that are not covered by revenue because the operating room (OR) time allocation and case scheduling are not done to maximize OR efficiency and because surgical durations are longer than average. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate a method to quantify net anesthesia staffing costs due to longer-than-average surgical durations and evaluate the factors that influence staffing costs. METHODS: Data collected from two anesthesiology departments in academic hospitals for 1 yr included date of surgery, time that patients entered the OR, time that patients exited the OR, surgical service, and the Current Procedural Terminology code for the primary surgical procedure. Anesthesia care performed outside the main surgical suite and services not billed with American Society of Anesthesiologists units were excluded. National average surgical durations were determined from the Current Procedural Terminology code from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' database. Actual surgical durations were then used to determine staffing solutions to maximize OR efficiency; national average surgical durations were then used to determine a second solution. The difference in staffing costs between these two staffing solutions represented the staffing costs attributable to longer surgical durations. Costs were converted to dollar amounts using compensation values reported in a national compensation survey. The differences in revenue were determined by applying conversion factors to the differences in surgical durations. The annual net cost attributable to longer surgical durations equaled the staffing costs minus the revenue produced by longer durations. Net staffing costs were estimated for two hospitals using median staffing compensation and median payer mix. Net staffing costs were then recalculated by varying the parameters (conversion factors, limits on differences between actual and average surgical duration, levels of compensation, surgical service size of OR allocation). RESULTS: Using the median compensation of staff and an average conversion factor, the net annual staffing costs attributable to longer surgical durations were $672,100 for the first hospital. However, if staff members were highly compensated and the payer mix was unfavorable, the net staffing costs were $1,688,000. Reducing the difference between actual and average duration resulted in lower staffing costs. Net staffing costs were less in a second hospital studied that had many low-volume surgical services. CONCLUSIONS: Longer-than-average surgical durations can increase net staffing costs for anesthesiology groups. The increase is dependent on factors such as staffing compensation and payer mix.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.