Sequences and techniques in spinal MR imaging.

Ph Demaerel; S Sunaert; G Wilms

PubMed · 14527063

Sequences and techniques in spinal MR imaging.

Abstract

The optimal protocol in spinal MR imaging is not evident. Sagittal T2 weighted FSE, sagittal T1 weighted SE and axial T2 weighted FSE sequences are widely accepted for imaging patients with sciatica and/or lumbar pain. Because of the limited amount of CSF compared to the lumbar spine, the choice of sequences is much more complex in the study of the cervical spine. Sagittal T2 FSE, sagittal T1 SE and axial 2D GE images are suggested in routine cervical spine imaging. To assess the bone marrow, a STIR sequence can be added to this protocol on both lumbar and cervical spine examinations. The 2D GE produces an acceptable image quality to differentiate between the disc and bony protrusions. The use of FLAIR for imaging spinal cord lesions remains controversial in the literature.

Explore related subjects

Cervical Vertebrae Humans Lumbar Vertebrae Magnetic Resonance Imaging Spinal Diseases Journal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeX RIS

Ph Demaerel, S Sunaert, G Wilms. Sequences and techniques in spinal MR imaging.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14527063/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Re: Hughes SS, Pringle T, Phillips F, et al. Settling of fibula grafts following multilevel anterior cervical corpectomy. A radiographic evaluation. Spine 2006;31:1911-5.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Cervical Vertebrae↗

PubMed2007

Images in clinical medicine. Prevertebral emphysema after a dental procedure.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Cervical Vertebrae↗

PubMed2007

Surgical treatment of cervical kyphosis in Larsen syndrome: report of 3 cases and review of the literature.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case series. OBJECTIVE: To review the surgical results for midcervical kyphosis in 3 cases with Larsen syndrome, and to discuss the choice of surgical treatments. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical kyphosis is the most hazardous and serious manifestation of Larsen syndrome due to the risk of life-threatening paralysis, and thus usually requires surgical treatment. However, little information has been reported concerning surgical treatments for this challenging condition. METHODS: Three patients with Larsen syndrome were surgically treated for midcervical kyphosis at our institution. RESULTS: An infant with mild cervical kyphosis was successfully treated with posterior arthrodesis using a halo immobilization, and anterior vertebral growth with a mature posterior fusion mass resulted in spontaneous correction of the kyphosis. In the remaining 2 infants with myelopathic symptoms due to severe and structural kyphosis, anterior decompression and fusion via a lateral approach followed by posterior fusion with segmental spinal instrumentation and halo immobilization resulted in improved neurologic symptoms and solid fusion. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior spinal fusion is only indicated for patients with mild and flexible cervical kyphosis, and anterior decompression and circumferential arthrodesis is required for patients with severe kyphotic deformity, who usually develop myelopathic symptoms. Anterior surgery for such a small patient with severe kyphosis involves much higher risk of spinal cord injury during decompression maneuvers and difficulty in stabilization of the reconstructed cervical spine. Therefore, all patients with Larsen syndrome should be screened with radiographs at the first visit to detect cervical kyphosis early so that posterior alone fusion is possible.

Cervical Vertebrae↗