PubMed · 14530714
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Sandra P Thomas. 2003. "Horizontal hostility".. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000446-200310000-00038
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Research has suggested that approach-related positive emotions are associated with greater left frontal brain activity and that withdrawal-related negative emotions are associated with greater right frontal brain activity. Different explanations have been proposed. One posits that frontal asymmetry is due to emotional valence (positivity/negativity), one posits that frontal asymmetry is due to motivational direction (approach/withdrawal), and one posits that frontal asymmetry is due to a combination of emotional valence and motivational direction (positive-approach/negative-withdrawal). Because research had confounded emotional valence and motivational direction, the theoretical explanation was muddled. Solely supporting the motivational direction model, recent research has revealed that anger and cognitive dissonance, emotions with negative valence and approach motivational tendencies, are related to relatively greater left frontal activity.
The common physiological rationale for migraine, anger, and epileptic attacks is discussed. The potential importance of homeostatic reactions in brain blood perfusion is described. The author speculates that these attacks are induced to meet some urgent biological needs. Each attack of migraine, anger, and epilepsy results in increased regional cerebral blood flow, with hypoperfusion being shown in inter-icteric states. This hypoperfusion may also be related to cerebral ischemic disease, organic change, some critical condition, or vasoconstriction due to sympathetic hyperactivity. Migraine attack is a subacute local vasomotor response. In contrast, anger and epileptic attacks are different manifestations of acute solemn general neuropsychiatric vasomotor reflexes. The newer paradigm of the etiological integration of these three kinds of attacks based on cerebral hemodynamic change does not only explain the mechanism of seizure-producing treatments such as electroconvulsive therapy, but also indicates the significance of cerebral vasodilative demands for the particular treatment of migraine, aggressive behavior, and epileptic seizures.