PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14568397

Preferential flow path development and its influence on long-term PRB performance: column study.

Abstract

The operating life of an Fe(0)-based permeable reactive barrier (PRB) is limited due to chemical reactions of Fe(0) in groundwater. The relative contributions from mineral precipitation, gas production, and microbial activity to the degradation of PRB performance have been uncertain. In this controlled field study, nitrate-rich, site groundwater was treated by Fe(0) in large-volume, flow-through columns to monitor the changes in chemical and hydraulic parameters over time. Tracer tests showed a close relationship between hydraulic residence time and pH measurements. The ionic profiles suggest that mineral precipitation and accumulation is the primary mechanism for pore clogging around the inlet of the column. Accumulated N(2) gas generated by biotic processes also affected the hydraulics although the effects were secondary to that of mineral precipitation. Quantitative estimates indicate a porosity reduction of up to 45.3% near the column inlet over 72 days of operation under accelerated flow conditions. According to this study, preferential flow through a PRB at a site with similar groundwater chemistry should be detected over approximately 1 year of operation. During the early operation of a PRB, pH is a key indicator for monitoring the change in hydraulic residence time resulting from heterogeneity development. If the surrounding native material is more conductive than the clogged Fe-media, groundwater bypass may render the PRB ineffective for treating contaminated groundwater.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W Kamolpornwijit, L Liang, O R West, G R Moline, A B Sullivan. 2003. Preferential flow path development and its influence on long-term PRB performance: column study.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-7722(03)00031-7

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Risks posed by climate change to the delivery of Water Framework Directive objectives in the UK.

The EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) is novel because it integrates water quality, water resources, physical habitat and, to some extent, flooding for all surface and groundwaters and takes forward river basin management. However, the WFD does not explicitly mention risks posed by climate change to the achievement of its environmental objectives. This is despite the fact that the time scale for the implementation process and achieving particular objectives extends into the 2020s, when climate models project changes in average temperature and precipitation. This paper begins by reviewing the latest UK climate change scenarios and the wider policy and science context of the WFD. We then examine the potential risks of climate change to key phases of the River Basin Management Process that underpin the WFD (such as characterisation of river basins and their water bodies, risk assessments to identify pressures and impacts, programmes of measures (POMs) options appraisal, monitoring and modelling, policy and management activities). Despite these risks the WFD could link new policy and participative mechanisms (being established for the River Basin Management Plans) to the emerging framework of national and regional climate change adaptation policy. The risks are identified with a view to informing policy opportunities, objective setting, adaptation strategies and the research agenda. Key knowledge gaps have already been identified during the implementation of the WFD, such as the links between hydromorphology and ecosystem status, but the overarching importance of linking climate change to these considerations needs to be highlighted. The next generation of (probabilistic) climate change scenarios will present new opportunities and challenges for risk analysis and policy-making.

Chemical Precipitation↗

Assessment of a preliminary solubility screen to improve crystallization trials: uncoupling crystal condition searches.

The utility of a preliminary solubility screen has been assessed on ten test proteins. It is proposed that maximizing the protein solubility prior to crystal setups is likely to improve crystal growth. In crystallization setups, drops of a protein solution are mixed with various crystallization solutions which are then allowed to equilibrate. The protein solutions usually contain a salt and buffer which are present as a constant in all crystal screens. The propensity for crystallization, driven by three components of sparse-matrix screens, the buffers, salts and precipitating agents, could potentially be masked by the components of the protein solution. Ten test proteins were dissolved in a standard buffer (100 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5) and in customized optimal buffers determined to maximize solubility. The proteins were then subjected to the Index (Hampton Research) 96-well sparse-matrix crystal screen and to a precipitant/precipitant-additive screen described here. Five of the ten proteins studied showed twofold to fourfold increases in the saturation level from standard to optimal buffer, two showed slight improvement and three showed a slight decrease. Microcrystals were obtained for all proteins and optimal buffer increased the appearance of crystals for eight of the ten proteins.

Chemical Precipitation↗

Solubility of schoepite: comparison and selection of complexation constants for U(VI).

Solubility of UO(3) x nH(2)O and sorption of U(VI) onto ferric (hydr)oxides were measured at pH 5.9, 6.8, and 7.8 at 10(-3.5)atm CO(2) using reaction times up to 48 days. Precipitation was fastest in the presence of hydrous ferric oxide and slower with hematite or without an initial solid phase. Solubility after 48 days was statistically similar for low to intermediate initial supersaturation conditions and increased for the highest initial supersaturation. Schoepite was identified for low-to-intermediate initial conditions of supersaturation and was not found for the highest initial supersaturation. Predicted concentrations of monomeric and polymeric species differed considerably with the different suites of complexation constants, resulting in significant differences in predicted oxidation-reduction potential and mobility of U(VI) in groundwater. Solubilities for low to intermediate initial supersaturation were best represented using complexation constants from Langmuir, D. [1978. Uranium solution-mineral equilibria at low temperatures with applications to sedimentary ore deposits. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 42, 547-569] and log*K(sp)=5.39 for schoepite, while solubilities for very high initial supersaturation were consistent with amorphous UO(3) x nH(2)O.

Chemical Precipitation↗