PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14594102

Prenatal HIV tests. Routine testing or informed choice?

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine how prenatal care providers responded to a new provincial policy of offering HIV testing to all prenatal patients, and to determine factors associated with self-reported high testing rates. DESIGN: Cross-sectional mailed survey. SETTING: Outpatient practices in three Ontario health-planning regions. PARTICIPANTS: Prenatal care providers: 784 family physicians, 200 obstetricians, and 103 midwives were sent questionnaires and were eligible to participate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-reported testing of 80% or more prenatal patients ("high testers") and associated practice characteristics, attitudes, and counseling practices. RESULTS: Response rate was 57% (622/1087): 43% of respondents were high testers. Family physicians were most likely and midwives least likely to be high testers. High testers tended to report that they had adequate knowledge of HIV testing, that HIV risk among their patients warranted testing all of them, and that testing should be routine. Encouraging women to test and not providing written information or choice were independently associated with high testing rates. CONCLUSION: Strongest predictors of high prenatal HIV testing rates were attitudes and practices that favoured a routine approach to testing and that placed little emphasis on informed consent.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Dale Guenter, Janusz Kaczorowski, June Carroll, John Sellors. 2003. Prenatal HIV tests. Routine testing or informed choice?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14594102/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Can increasing awareness of HIV seropositivity reduce infections by 50% in the United States?

BACKGROUND: In 2003, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced an HIV prevention initiative that emphasized increasing the proportion of persons living with HIV who are aware of their positive serostatus. Previously, CDC set a national HIV prevention goal of reducing new infections by 50% by 2005, with increasing serostatus awareness a central goal. The objectives of this article are to examine the national epidemiologic consequences of increasing serostatus awareness and the important question of how far increasing awareness could lead toward achieving CDC's goal of a 50% reduction in incident infections. METHODS: Scenario analysis methods were used to project incident HIV infections over 1- and 10-year time horizons at varying levels of HIV seropositivity awareness. Because HIV transmission rates are several times higher for those who are unaware of their HIV seropositivity than for those who are aware, we modeled the effects of increasing awareness via HIV counseling and testing and moving people from the higher to the lower transmission category. RESULTS: Increasing awareness of HIV seropositivity via HIV counseling and testing in the United States from a baseline 75% to 95% has the potential of reducing new infections by as much as 32% in a single year. Achieving the national goal of 50% reduction seems out of reach, however. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction of new infections by 50% in the United States requires a combination of prevention services to reduce further the already low HIV transmission rate from persons aware of their HIV seropositivity and HIV risk reduction interventions for at-risk persons. Counseling and testing alone seems insufficient to meet the 50% incidence reduction goal.

AIDS Serodiagnosis↗

Estimating HIV incidence in voluntary counseling and testing clients in Uganda (1992-2003).

OBJECTIVES: To estimate HIV incidence from first-time testers among voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) clients in Uganda. METHODS: Data on 203,000 VCT clients tested from 1992 through 2003 were adjusted for temporal changes in the testing population. Differential mortality rates by HIV status were used to derive expected prevalence at future times from baseline prevalence within 5-year birth cohorts. Incidence was computed as the proportion of HIV-uninfected persons who seroconverted divided by the proportion negative at baseline. RESULTS: Annual HIV incidence per 100 uninfected persons increased from 0.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.8 to 1.1) in 1993 to 2.3 (95% CI: 2.2 to 2.5) in 2003 (chi test for trend, P < 0.001). Prevalence decreased from 23% to 13% in 1999 to 2000 and increased to 15% in 2003. Women had a higher incidence. Peak incidence shifted to older age groups over time. CONCLUSIONS: Estimating incidence from routine data presents a practical way of tracking HIV incidence and is a useful tool in targeting and evaluating the impact of prevention programs. Our analysis reveals a new phase of the HIV epidemic in Uganda: decreasing prevalence and increasing incidence, especially among middle-aged persons. These findings support the need for intensified prevention interventions among middle-aged persons in Uganda.

AIDS Serodiagnosis↗