PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14597913

Assessing brain development using neurophysiologic and behavioral measures.

Abstract

One critical aspect of pediatric research is the assessment of outcome measures after treatment or intervention. Behavioral measures of physical growth, school achievement, and general intelligence have proven to be important scales for assessing gross developmental outcome and differences between pediatric treatment groups. However, more subtle and sophisticated measures may be required to assess finer grained differences in brain development at the structural and functional levels. Advances in noninvasive brain imaging techniques over the past decade have improved our ability to link specific cognitive functions to changes in brain structure and function in healthy infants and children. This paper highlights some of the ways that electrophysiologic and functional magnetic resonance imaging methods have been combined with behavioral measures of cognitive and emotional function to advance our understanding of brain-behavior relations. Such combined neurophysiologic and behavioral methods may help to identify the role specific interventions have on long-term developmental outcomes in childhood.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kathleen M Thomas. 2003. Assessing brain development using neurophysiologic and behavioral measures.. https://doi.org/10.1067/s0022-3476(03)00401-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The inversion In(2L)t impacts complex, environmentally sensitive behaviors in Drosophila melanogaster.

Genetic variation in behavioral traits allows organisms to respond and adapt to environmental challenges. Genetic variation in behavior is often affected by many genes and thus has a complex genetic basis. Inversions, the reorientation of genes along the chromosome, tightly link genetic variants together because they suppress recombination. Therefore, inversions are believed to have a major impact on phenotypic variation because they combine the effects of multiple genes, which can pleiotropically alter multiple aspects of behavior. This study investigates how the inversion In(2L)t, found in Drosophila melanogaster populations around the world, impacts different aspects of behavior in an environment-sensitive manner. We test the activity, foraging, and startle-induced behavior of flies with different In(2L)t genotypes across sex and temperatures. We observe that Drosophila homozygous for In(2L)t sleep less frequently, spend more time away from a food source, and have a longer duration of startle response. Additionally, the impacts of In(2L)t on aspects of behavior can be sex-specific and are largely consistent across temperatures. Taken together, our research demonstrates that inversions can regulate aspects of behavior, and suggests hypotheses explaining the distribution of In(2L)t across space and time.

Behavior↗

A simple test of expected utility theory using professional traders.

We compare behavior across students and professional traders from the Chicago Board of Trade in a classic Allais paradox experiment. Our experiment tests whether independence, a necessary condition in expected utility theory, is systematically violated. We find that both students and professionals exhibit some behavior consistent with the Allais paradox, but the data pattern does suggest that the trader population falls prey to the Allais paradox less frequently than the student population.

Behavior↗

Race and genetics: controversies in biomedical, behavioral, and forensic sciences.

Among biomedical scientists, there is a great deal of controversy over the nature of race, the relevance of racial categories for research, and the proper methods of using racial variables. This article argues that researchers and scholars should avoid a binary-type argument, in which the question is whether to use race always or never. Researchers should instead focus on developing standards for when and how to use racial variables. The article then discusses 1 context, criminology, in which the use of racial variables in behavioral genetics research could be particularly problematic. If genetic studies of criminalized behavior use forensic DNA databanks or forensic genetic profiles, they will be confounded by the many racial biases of the law enforcement and penal system.

Behavior↗