PubMed · 14626741
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Teresa McRorie Osborn, Greg Redding. The PEAK study: does pharmaceutical care make a difference?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14626741/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
A novel design for a study comparing two drugs (A and B), their combination (AB) and placebo (P) in a stable disease such as chronic asthma is proposed. The primary objectives of the trial are to compare A (a new drug) with placebo and AB with B (an old drug). Other between-treatment comparisons are secondary. The new design consists of the first 2 sequences of a single 4 x 4 Latin square: (A, AB, P, B|P, B, A, AB|AB, A, B, P|B, P, AB, A). The washout period between A and AB and that between P and B are eliminated based on the assumptions that there is no carry-over effect from placebo and that the effect of the combination would be approximately same at steady state either starting the 2 drugs at the same time or adding one later. Equal period effect for Periods 1 and 2, and for Periods 3 and 4 are also assumed for all treatment effects being estimable. Advantages and disadvantages of this design were evaluated and compared with other possible designs. Compared with other possible designs, the new design is more efficient. For example, the new design requires less than (1/4) of the sample size a parallel design would need and it requires (2/3) of the sample size a 4-treatment, 3-period incomplete block design would need for the same power at the same detectable difference. It has a similar efficiency to a 4-treatment, 4-period cross-over design but with a shorter duration. In this design, all between-treatment comparisons are based on direct within-subject information. The new design could also potentially decrease the probability of patient's drop-outs and use of rescue medication due to lack of efficacy during the placebo periods by reducing the number of placebo washout periods. The benefits reaped from the new design seem to outweigh its risks, which include potential bias for the secondary between-treatment comparisons if the additional assumption about period effects are not satisfied and the incapability of directly assessing the onset of action of the combination of 2 drugs.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
WHAT WE NEED TO KNOW: Are there differences in symptom interpretation in older people with asthma? What are effective drug delivery strategies in older people to maximise adherence and minimise side effects? How do older people with asthma manage their asthma? Are self-management strategies as appropriate as they are in younger age groups? Do older people with asthma take appropriate steps in an emergency? Do they own or act on asthma action plans? WHAT WE NEED TO DO: Identify the specific barriers that prevent the optimal care of older people with asthma. Address systematic barriers, such as cost and immobility, that reduce access to effective treatments. Ensure older people with asthma receive appropriate asthma treatment. Explore asthma self-management strategies in older people to develop effective algorithms. Educate health professionals to provide optimal asthma treatments and deliver appropriate education designed specifically for older people.