PubMed · 14631734
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
Michael J Bamshad, Steve E Olson. 2003. Does race exist?. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1203-78
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Alu elements are one of the most successful families of transposons in the human genome. A portion of Alu elements is transcribed by RNA Pol III, whereas the remaining ones are part of Pol II transcripts. Because Alu elements are highly repetitive, it has been difficult to identify the Pol III-transcribed elements and quantify their expression levels. In this study, we generated high-resolution, long-genomic-span RAMPAGE data in 155 biosamples all with matching RNA-seq data and built an atlas of 17,249 Pol III-transcribed Alu elements. We further performed an integrative analysis on the ChIP-seq data of 10 histone marks and hundreds of transcription factors, whole-genome bisulfite sequencing data, ChIA-PET data, and functional data in several biosamples, and our results revealed that although the human-specific Alu elements are transcriptionally repressed, the older, expressed Alu elements may be exapted by the human host to function as cell-type-specific enhancers for their nearby protein-coding genes.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Alu elements are non-autonomous, non-LTR retroposons that represent the most abundant mobile elements in the human genome (1.1 x 10(6) copies/genome). They preferentially insert adjacent to existing Alu elements. It has been proposed that Alu elements utilize LINE-1 machinery for their retroposition. The LINE-1 endonuclease cleaves at a loose consensus sequence. We have utilized a bioinformatics approach to show the order of insertion of pairs of young (Y) and old (S or J) Alu subfamily members. Our data suggest that the consensus LINE-1 endonuclease cleavage site used for insertion of the old Alu elements can be reused for integration of the younger ones inserting adjacent to them. However, there is also a preference at the 3' end of Alu into a non-ideal cleavage site that may represent unique properties of the A-tail for integration. Alu elements inserting adjacent to one another may suggest the saturation of the optimal integration sites with existing Alu elements, rather than any innate preference for Alu elements to integrate adjacent to other Alus.