PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14654612

Do needs drive services use in young children?

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether different factors predicted parental recognition of mental health problems in children and use of services for those problems and to determine whether mental health problems elicit service use in the same way as physical health or developmental problems. METHODS: Survey of the parents of an age- and sex-stratified random sample of children who were born in 1 Connecticut hospital selected from state birth records. RESULTS: Logistic regression results demonstrate that a number of child and family factors are related to problem recognition, defined as thinking about seeking services and/or talking to a professional about a problem. However, factors related to the third outcome of interest-service use-are more limited and include only physical health and developmental problems, parental worry about language, and family conflict. Furthermore, mental health problems were not discussed with professionals, and they were not associated with receipt of services at the same rates as physical health or developmental problems. CONCLUSIONS: The correlates of problem recognition (defined as thinking about seeking services or actually speaking to a professional about a problem) differ from those of service use, and, whereas mental health, physical health, and developmental problems all affect problem recognition, mental health problems do not result in service use. Furthermore, rates of service use vary dramatically across the 3 categories. These results suggest that needs alone do not drive service use. Rather, other factors may influence which needs are met.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sarah McCue Horwitz, Lisa C Gary, Margaret J Briggs-Gowan, Alice S Carter. 2003. Do needs drive services use in young children?. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.112.6.1373

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Implementing emergency research requiring exception from informed consent, community consultation, and public disclosure.

Conducting emergency research in the out-of-hospital and emergency department setting is a challenge because of the inability of patients to provide informed consent in many situations. Federal guidelines allowing research under an exception from informed consent for emergency research have been established (21 CRF 50.24). Community consultation and public disclosure, 2 required components of obtaining this exception, are seen by many as a barrier to resuscitation research. This article will provide a brief overview of the history of the exception from informed consent for emergency research and summarize our methods recently used to successfully complete community consultation and public disclosure for a trial evaluating 2 devices used during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a large metropolitan area.

Attitude to Health↗