PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14712621

Glycohemoglobin analyzers.

Abstract

For the millions of people with diabetes, maintaining near-normal glucose levels is vital for reducing or slowing the complications of the disease. A crucial tool for monitoring blood glucose levels is the glycohemoglobin (GHb) test. GHb analysis indicates the amount of glucose a patient's red blood cells were exposed to during the previous two to three months, allowing physicians to track trends and make appropriate changes in therapy. In the United States, this test is commonly performed on blood samples that have been sent to a laboratory, with written results provided to the physician several days later. Recently, though, analyzers have come onto the market that can be used at the point of care--a clinic or physician's office--or even in the home, providing results immediately. We evaluated five GHb analyzers from four suppliers: Axis-Shield, Bayer, Bio-Rad Laboratories, and Metrika. These products vary considerably--for example, one is a single-use test kit intended for point-of-care settings, while another is a batch analyzer that can run 15 samples at a time and is designed for low- to moderate-volume laboratory use. Our testing focused primarily on the analyzers' accuracy, precision, and ease of use. Different facilities will have different requirements, and none of these factors alone should determine a facility's purchasing decision. Rather, purchasers will have to balance all the performance factors--along with cost--when choosing a product. Consequently, we have provided separate ratings for hospital laboratory testing, point-of-care testing, and--for the one applicable unit--home testing.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

2003. Glycohemoglobin analyzers.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14712621/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Semiautomated determination of pesticides in water using solid phase extraction disks and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

A method based on semiautomated solid phase extraction using octadecyl-bonded silica disks and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, operated in selected ion monitoring mode, allows detection and quantification of approximately 100 pesticides and transformation products in drinking water. Samples (500 mL) were passed through the disk, and the retained pesticides were eluted with acetone and ethyl acetate. Typical recoveries for pesticides at 0.1 microg L(-1) in water were in the range of 72-120% with relative standard deviations less than 20%. Calibration curves were linear over the range of 0.025-0.5 microg mL(-1) (equivalent to a concentration range in drinking water of 0.05-1.0 microg L(-1)).

Autoanalysis↗

A quantitative high-throughput trapping assay as a measurement of potential for bioactivation.

Idiosyncratic adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are one of the most common causes of pharmaceutical withdrawals and labeling changes. Most ADRs are caused by drugs that form reactive species that can bind covalently to macromolecules such as proteins. The current methodology for the measurement of covalent binding relies on the use of radiolabeled material that requires an investment in time and resources not typically expended until later in the discovery process. Efforts are also made to identify reactive intermediates by the use of chemical trapping agents, such as reduced glutathione and cyanide, to form stable adducts that are characterized by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and/or nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Here, we describe a high-throughput assay for the measurement of reactive intermediate formation. The method involves incubation of cold compound with liver microsomes in the presence of [14C]potassium cyanide. Hard electrophilic species would react with the trapping agent, resulting in the formation of a radiolabeled conjugate. Unreacted trapping agent is removed using solid-phase extraction, and the amount of radiolabeled conjugate present is determined by liquid scintillation counting. This newly developed screen has proved to be specific, sensitive, robust, and a powerful tool for assessing bioactivation potential.

Autoanalysis↗

Phosphate concentration in artificial tears.

BACKGROUND: Irrigating solutions and eye drops may contain phosphates as part of their buffer system. In the presence of epithelial keratopathy, a high concentration of phosphate favours corneal calcification. Knowledge of the phosphate concentration in artificial tear products helps to prevent this sight-threatening complication. This study gives an overview on the amount of phosphate contained in artificial tears. METHODS: Fifty-nine samples of commercially available artificial tear preparations were tested. The quantification of phosphate was performed using the molybdate method on a Modular P autoanalyzer. RESULTS: Twenty-six of 59 (44%) artificial tear products had a phosphate concentration above physiological levels (>1.45 mmol/l). A phosphate concentration above 25 mmol/l was found in nine products (15%), a concentration higher than 50 mmol/l in three (5%). CONCLUSIONS: Many artificial tear formulations contain unphysiological levels of phosphate, but very high concentrations are found only in a few products. These preparations have the potential to favour the formation of insoluble crystalline calcium phosphate deposits when used on a damaged corneal surface, and should therefore be used cautiously.

Autoanalysis↗