PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 14719980

A framework for understanding the training process leading to elite performance.

David J Smith
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The development of performance in competition is achieved through a training process that is designed to induce automation of motor skills and enhance structural and metabolic functions. Training also promotes self-confidence and a tolerance for higher training levels and competition. In general, there are two broad categories of athletes that perform at the highest level: (i) the genetically talented (the thoroughbred); and (ii) those with a highly developed work ethic (the workhorse) with a system of training guiding their effort. The dynamics of training involve the manipulation of the training load through the variables: intensity, duration and frequency. In addition, sport activities are a combination of strength, speed and endurance executed in a coordinated and efficient manner with the development of sport-specific characteristics. Short- and long-term planning (periodisation) requires alternating periods of training load with recovery for avoiding excessive fatigue that may lead to overtraining. Overtraining is long-lasting performance incompetence due to an imbalance of training load, competition, non-training stressors and recovery. Furthermore, annual plans are normally constructed in macro-, meso- and microcycles around the competitive phases with the objective of improving performance for a peak at a predetermined time. Finally, at competition time, optimal performance requires a healthy body, and integration of not only the physiological elements but also the psychological, technical and tactical components.

Explore related subjects

Body CompositionHeart RateHumansOxygen ConsumptionPhysical Education and TrainingPhysical EndurancePhysical FitnessRunningSportsSwimmingTask Performance and AnalysisJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

David J Smith. 2003. A framework for understanding the training process leading to elite performance.. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200333150-00003

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Two years of growth hormone therapy in young children with Prader-Willi syndrome: physical and neurodevelopmental benefits.

Infants with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) typically display failure to thrive and decreased muscle mass with excess body fat for age. Growth hormone (GH) therapy in children with PWS improves, but does not normalize, body composition and muscle strength and agility. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of earlier GH therapy on anthropometric measurements, body composition, and psychomotor development in affected PWS infants and toddlers. Twenty-five subjects, ages 4-37 months, were randomized to 2 years of GH therapy (1 mg/m(2)/day) or 1 year of observation without GH treatment and then placed on GH (1.5 mg/m(2).day) for 1 year only. Anthropometric measurements were obtained by standard methods: percent body fat, lean body mass, and total body bone mineral density by dual x-ray absorptiometry; motor constructs of mobility and stability by the Toddler Infant Motor Evaluation; and cognitive and language function by the Capute Scales of Infant Language and Cognitive Development. GH-treated PWS subjects demonstrated normalization of length/height standard deviation scores (SDS), faster head growth, increased lean body mass accrual, and decreased percent body fat (P < 0.005 for all parameters), as well as improved language (P = 0.05) and cognitive (P = 0.02) quotient Z-scores compared with similarly aged untreated PWS subjects after 1 year into the study. PWS subjects treated before their first birthday spoke their first words at a mean age of 14.4 +/- 2.8 months and walked independently at 23.3 +/- 4.8 months. GH therapy was well-tolerated; however, one PWS subject experienced scoliosis progression. As greater benefits were seen in our study with early treatment, prompt referral to a pediatric endocrinologist for consideration of GH therapy is recommended for PWS at an early age.

Body Composition↗
PubMed2007

Effect of plant sterols and exercise training on cholesterol absorption and synthesis in previously sedentary hypercholesterolemic subjects.

Plant sterols combined with exercise beneficially alter lipid profiles in hypercholesterolemic adults. Although the mechanism by which plant sterols favorably modulate lipid levels is well established, no trial to date has examined the effect of exercise, alone or combined with plant sterols, on cholesterol kinetics. Thus, the current objective was to examine the effects of exercise, plant sterols, and the combination of exercise and plant sterols on cholesterol absorption and synthesis. In an 8-week, parallel-arm trial, 84 subjects were randomized to 1 of 4 interventions: plant sterols combined with exercise, plant sterols, exercise, or control. Diets were not controlled. Total cholesterol and triglyceride levels decreased (P<0.01) by 7.7% and 11.8%, respectively, whereas high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels increased (P<0.01) by 7.5% in the combination group. Mean posttreatment low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels decreased (P<0.01) by 0.30 mmol/L in the combination group. Cholesterol absorption was 16% lower (P<0.01) in the combination group and 18% lower (P<0.01) in the plant sterol group, when compared with control. Exercise had no effect on cholesterol absorption. Nonsignificant increases in cholesterol synthesis rates of 63% (0.084+/-0.014 pools/day), 59% (0.075+/-0.013 pools/day), and 57% (0.072+/-0.011 pools/day) were observed in the combination, exercise, and plant sterol groups, respectively, relative to the control group (0.031+/-0.019 pools/day). LDL cholesterol levels correlated with cholesterol absorption, as represented by the area under the deuterium enrichment curve (r=0.23, P=0.05), and with percent absorption relative to control (r=0.25, P=0.03). These findings suggest that exercise does not modulate lipid levels by altering to cholesterol absorption or synthesis, whereas plant sterols favorably alter levels of LDL cholesterol by suppressing intestinal absorption.

Body Composition↗