PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14733694

The PhoenixCare Program.

Abstract

In response to a perceived need for patient access to palliative care and supportive services prior to hospice eligibility, Phoenix-based Hospice of the Valley (HOV) applied for and received a 3-year demonstration grant (1999-2001) from The Robert Wood Johnson (RWJ) Promoting Excellence in End-Of-Life Care Project. HOV established the PhoenixCare project as a demonstration of palliative and coordinated care (case management) services for seriously chronically ill individuals still undergoing active treatment of their disease within a managed care setting. The model emphasized patient/family self-empowerment and prevention. The goal was to demonstrate that it was possible to expand the scope of care for the seriously chronically ill, add palliative care, and improve patient quality of life at less (or no more) cost than that for a comparable group of managed care patients not receiving PhoenixCare services. The model proved most useful to patients willing and able to assume a degree of control over their own care. Physicians referred fewer than 5% of the patients enrolled while managed care plan case managers and hospital discharge planners referred 83%, suggesting that in organized systems of care physicians are not a primary source for patient referrals. The structure and content of the PhoenixCare model, its general acceptability to patients, physicians and managed care plans, and its applicability to other sites are discussed in this article. Outcomes from the study will be published in a subsequent paper.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Carol A Lockhart, Barbara E Volk-Craft, Gillian Hamilton, Leona S Aiken, Frank G Williams. 2003. The PhoenixCare Program.. https://doi.org/10.1089/109662103322654929

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Creating the environment for a successful community partnership.

This paper describes the development of the American Indian Oncology Program (AIOP) and presents the accomplishments of a participatory research approach that involved an integrated network for cancer care and research. AIOP used a participatory process to develop infrastructure, identify research questions, develop methodologies, write supplemental grants, and evaluate accomplishments based on community defined measures of success. Partnerships between University and Indian Health Service, private, and state institutions led to improved collaboration. Health services delivery improved by increasing provider involvement at multiple institutions via a Tumor Board. Community awareness improved through workshops addressing community-specific cancer concerns. Collectively, these resulted in an environment receptive to the development of research activities. The AIOP team, through a participatory process, developed infrastructure at each institution that facilitated interaction, community-based education, and improved patient care; identified new partners; raised community-level knowledge and awareness about cancer; encouraged a research-friendly environment and building research capacity; and increased the cultural competency of researchers wishing to work in American Indian communities and created a cadre of future American Indian cancer researchers. As evidenced by successful pilot project development and formation of ongoing research and funding applications, the authors created a research-receptive environment and promoted potentially sustainable research capacity in the community. Much of their success is the result of utilizing a participatory model for capacity building that included not only communities but institutions. Cancer 2006. Published 2006 by the American Cancer Society.

Arizona↗

A case study in resort climatology of Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

Tourists often use weather data as a factor for determining vacation timing and location. Accuracy and perceptions of weather information may impact these decisions. This study: (a) examines air temperature and dew points from seven exclusive resorts in the Phoenix metropolitan area and compares them with official National Weather Service data for the same period, and (b) utilizes a comfort model called OUTCOMES-OUTdoor COMfort Expert System-in a seasonal appraisal of two resorts, one mesic and one xeric, compared with the urban Sky Harbor International Airport first-order weather station site in the central urban area of Phoenix, Arizona, USA (lat. 33.43 degrees N; long. 112.02 degrees W; elevation at 335 m). Temperature and humidity recording devices were placed within or immediately adjacent to common-use areas of the resorts, the prime recreational sites used by guests on most resort properties. Recorded data were compared with that of the official weather information from the airport station, a station most accessible to potential tourists through media and Web sites, to assess predicted weather for vacation planning. For the most part, Sky Harbor's recorded air temperatures and often dew points were higher than those recorded at the resorts. We extrapolate our findings to a year-round estimate of human outdoor comfort for weather-station sites typical of resort landscapes and the Sky Harbor location using the OUTCOMES model to refine ideas on timing of comfortable conditions at resorts on a diurnal and seasonal basis.

Arizona↗

Guilty.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Arizona↗