PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 14743264

Ocular allergic disease.

Abstract

Ocular allergy is a common condition that usually affects the conjunctiva of the eye and is therefore often referred to as allergic conjunctivitis. The severity of the disease can range from mild itching and redness, as seen in seasonal allergic conjunctivitis, to the more serious vision threatening forms of ocular allergy which affect the cornea, such as atopic keratoconjunctivitis. The pathogenesis of allergic conjunctivitis involves a complex mechanism which centers around IgE-mediated mast cell degranulation and release of multiple preformed and newly formed inflammatory mediators. The diagnosis of allergic conjunctivitis is usually a clinical one which can be made based on a thorough history and careful examination. Treatment of ocular allergy should begin with conservative measures including allergen avoidance, environmental control, ocular irrigation and cold compresses. Pharmacotherapy of allergic conjunctivitis consists of several classes of drugs. Antihistamines are widely used to treat mild conditions such as seasonal and perennial conjunctivitis and potent new agents such as levocabastine and emedastine are now available. Mast cell stabilizers such as sodium cromoglycate are both safe and effective and are commonly used in ocular allergy. More effective mast cell stabilizers such as nedocromil, lodoxamide and olopatadine are now being used. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs have demonstrated only limited efficacy and, as such, are not widely used. Topical steroids are very effective in treating signs and symptoms but are reserved for only refractory cases due to their serious side effects. Loteprednol and rimexelone are newer corticosteroids which reportedly have less of an effect on intraocular pressure. Cyclosporine has recently been shown to be highly effective in cases of vernal keratoconjunctivitis and atopic keratoconjunctivitis while producing no adverse effects.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Bhargava, W B Jackson, S R El-Defrawy. 1998. Ocular allergic disease.. https://doi.org/10.1358/dot.1998.34.11.487480

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗