PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15045452

Hexacyanoferrate-based composite ion-sensitive electrodes for voltammetry.

Abstract

Composite electrodes made of graphite, paraffin and metal hexacyanoferrates exhibit a voltammetric response of the hexacyanoferrate ions, the potential of which depends linearly on the logarithm of concentration of alkali and alkaline-earth metal ions. This behaviour has been observed on account of the fact that the electrochemical reaction is accompanied by an exchange of these ions between the solution and the zeolitic lattice of the hexacyanoferrates for charge compensation. The voltammetric determination of the formal potential of these electrodes in a solution allows the quantitative analysis of the ions which are exchanged between the metal hexacyanoferrates and the aqueous solutions. Iron(III), copper(II), silver(I), nickel(II) and cadmium(II) hexacyanoferrates have been studied for the determination of H(+), Li(+), Na(+), K(+), Rb(+), Cs(+), NH(+)(4), Mg(2+), Ca(2+) and Ba(2+). In some cases, the selectivity constants are as low as 3.10(-4), or even so small that their exact value is inaccessible. Electrodes made of iron (III), copper (II), silver (I), nickel (II) and cadmium (II) hexacyanoferrates are most suitable for the determination of potassium ions. Electrodes with nickel (II) and cadmium (II) hexacyanoferrates are also suitable for the determination of caesium ions. The working range of the electrodes also depends on the conductivity of the solutions and can range from 10(-5) to 1 mol l(-1). Typical standard deviations of the potential measurements are 3 mV.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Düssel, A Dostal, F Scholz. 1996. Hexacyanoferrate-based composite ion-sensitive electrodes for voltammetry.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s0021663550021

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of high-dose versus standard-dose influenza vaccines against hospitalisation according to frailty risk: a prespecified analysis of the randomised trial DANFLU-2.

BACKGROUND: Frailty is a major risk factor for influenza-related complications and can influence vaccine effectiveness. We aimed to assess the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of high-dose (HD-IIV) versus standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) in older adults aged 65 years or older according to frailty risk. METHODS: This study was a prespecified analysis of DANFLU-2, an open-label, individually randomised trial, conducted in Denmark during three consecutive influenza seasons (2022-23, 2023-24, and 2024-25). Adults aged 65 years or older were randomised (1:1) to the HD-IIV or SD-IIV group. The primary endpoint was hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia. Frailty was defined according to the validated Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) based on ICD-10 codes within 10 years before randomisation. Participants were stratified into three HFRS categories, namely low (<5 points), intermediate (5-15 points), and high (>15 points) frailty risk. The rVE of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint was assessed across prespecified HFRS categories and treating HFRS as a continuous variable. Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare safety events across frailty risk groups and randomisation groups. FINDINGS: Among 332&#x2009;438 randomised participants (mean age 73&#xb7;7 years [SD 5&#xb7;8]; 161&#x2009;538 [48&#xb7;6%] were female), 276&#x2009;173 (83&#xb7;1%) had low frailty risk, 52&#x2009;395 (15&#xb7;8%) had intermediate frailty risk, and 3861 (1&#xb7;2%) had high frailty risk. The primary endpoint of hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia occurred in 1424 (0&#xb7;5%) of 276&#x2009;173 participants with low frailty risk, 761 (1&#xb7;5%) of 52&#x2009;395 with intermediate frailty risk, and 163 (4&#xb7;2%) of 3861 with high frailty risk (relative risk [RR] for intermediate vs low frailty risk 2&#xb7;8 [95% CI 2&#xb7;6-3&#xb7;1]; RR for high vs low frailty risk 8&#xb7;2 [7&#xb7;0-9&#xb7;6]). HFRS as a continuous variable significantly modified the effect of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against the primary endpoint with higher rVE estimates with increasing HFRS (pinteraction=0&#xb7;020). The rVE was 0&#xb7;2% (95% CI -10&#xb7;8 to 10&#xb7;2) among those with low frailty risk, 13&#xb7;1% (-0&#xb7;4 to 24&#xb7;8) among those with intermediate frailty risk, and 19&#xb7;9% (-10&#xb7;3 to 42&#xb7;1) among those with high frailty risk. No significant interaction was observed when HFRS was assessed according to the prespecified categorical frailty groups (pinteraction=0&#xb7;17). The proportion of participants with at least one serious adverse event increased across frailty risk groups (13&#x2009;366 [4&#xb7;8%] of 275&#x2009;795 for low frailty risk, 5475 [10&#xb7;5%] of 52&#x2009;315 for intermediate frailty risk, and 777 [20&#xb7;2%] of 3850 for high frailty risk; p<0&#xb7;0001), with similar proportions of serious adverse events in the HD-IIV and SD-IIV groups for each frailty risk group. INTERPRETATION: Among adults aged 65 years or older in Denmark, frailty risk might modify the effects of HD-IIV versus SD-IIV against hospitalisation for influenza or pneumonia, with higher rVE estimates with increasing frailty risk. These findings might support considering high-dose influenza vaccines for frail older adults. However, effect modification was not evident when frailty was assessed using prespecified categorical subgroups, and subgroup-specific estimates were imprecise, with 95% CIs crossing the null. These results should be considered exploratory, warranting further investigation. FUNDING: The DANFLU-2 trial was funded by Sanofi.

Journal Article↗