PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 15057089

Distal ingrowth components.

Abstract

The literature documents that distal ingrowth fixation provides a reproducible, durable option that can be used in many femoral revision situations. In this review, we describe our use of cylindrical, extensively porous-coated stems to achieve distal fixation. The procedure involves choosing 5 cm to 7 cm of diaphyseal bone and reaming it cylindrically for a porous-coated femoral stem. Surgical implantation is uncomplicated because the femoral diaphysis aligns the component and imparts a reproducible press-fit sensation during impaction. The complications are well documented and can be avoided with adequate exposure, intraoperative radiographs, and surgical experience. Survivorship data based on femoral revisions done at our institution with extensively porous-coated stems show overall excellent results although a relatively poorer outcome is associated with patients whose prerevision cortical damage involves bone more than 10 cm below the lesser trochanter.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Anderson Engh, Robert H Hopper, Charles A Engh. 2004. Distal ingrowth components.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200403000-00019

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Total hip arthroplasty wear simulation using the boundary element method.

In this paper an application of the boundary element method for simulating wear in total hip prosthesis is presented. Several examples including different update periods of the worn acetabular cup, various femoral head sizes and various materials for both the femoral head and the acetabular cup are simulated under the same variable loading conditions for up to 20 years of service. Moreover, two different femoral models are considered in order to investigate the influence of the femoral modelling. The analysis demonstrates that due to the boundary only modelling requirement, the computational time and storage remains low, allowing large service periods to be simulated. Generally, the results obtained are in good agreement with other researchers findings. Moreover, ignoring the bending of the femoral neck in the model, results in a small overestimation of the maximum wear depth, while the volumetric wear is slightly underestimated. However, these differences are trivial considering the reduction of the computational effort.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip↗

Total hip arthroplasty of dysplastic hip after previous Chiari pelvic osteotomy.

INTRODUCTION: Many reports have suggested that Chiari pelvic osteotomy would improve the results of acetabular component placement and fixation in subsequent total hip arthroplasty. However, little is known concerning the biomechanical, radiological, and clinical effects of Chiari pelvic osteotomy on subsequent total hip arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten total hip arthroplasties for developmental dysplasia of the hip after previous Chiari pelvic osteotomy (Chiari group) were compared with 20 total hip arthroplasties for developmental dysplasia of the hip without previous surgery (control group). Preoperative patient demographic data and operative technique were well matched between the groups. The mean duration of follow-up was 3.0 years. Biomechanical, radiological, and clinical evaluations were performed. RESULTS: No acetabular or femoral components exhibited loosening. All patients had good or excellent clinical score according to the Merle d'Aubigne-Postel rating system at the most recent follow-up. Abductor force and joint force were smaller in the Chiari group, although long operative time, more blood loss, and verticalization of joint force were noted in this group. CONCLUSION: This limited study suggested that Chiari pelvic osteotomy changed the biomechanical features of the hip joint, and that this alteration might have compromised subsequent total hip arthroplasty.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip↗

The effects of surgical volumes and training centre status on outcomes following total joint replacement: analysis of the Hospital Episode Statistics for England.

OBJECTIVE: Previous work from other countries has shown a significant inverse relationship between the number of some surgical procedures undertaken in a hospital and in an adverse outcomes. In the light of the changing nature of the provision of joint replacements in the United Kingdom, we have examined the effects of surgical volumes and the presence/absence of training centre status, on outcomes following total joint replacement (TJR) in England. METHODS: Analysis of the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) on all hip/knee joint replacements in English National Health Service (NHS) trusts between financial years 1997 and 2002. Exposures explored were the volume of hip/knee replacements per annum in an NHS trust, training centre status and whether the admission was routine or emergency. Four surrogate measures of adverse outcome were assessed: 30-day in-hospital mortality, length of stay in hospital, readmission within a year and surgical revision within 5 years. Age and sex were controlled for as potential confounders. RESULTS: Data from a total of 281 360 hip replacements and 211 099 knee replacements were examined. HES data show that the numbers of TJRs performed in low volume trusts are small and decreasing. Adverse outcomes were also uncommon. Nevertheless, significant associations between adverse outcomes and low volume units, and better outcomes in training centres, were detected. For example, the odds ratio (OR) for in-hospital death within 30 days of hip replacement in trusts doing <50 hip/replacements per annum is 1.98 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.13-3.47] compared with trusts doing 251-500 operations/annum. Similarly, surgery in non-training centres is more likely to result in mortality than that in training centres (OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.05-1.48). The examination of surgical revision indicated adverse outcomes in higher volume units; this may be due to case-mix. CONCLUSION: In England, there are fewer adverse events following TJR in high volume centres and in orthopaedic training centres. Standardization of procedures may account for this finding. The data have implications for private practice in the United Kingdom and for the current move to undertake TJRs in Independent Sector Treatment Centres.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip↗